Skip to content

Conversation

@clee2000
Copy link
Contributor

@clee2000 clee2000 commented Oct 30, 2024

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Oct 30, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/139296

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit 10ca244 with merge base 9bbe4a6 (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the topic: not user facing topic category label Oct 30, 2024
@clee2000 clee2000 temporarily deployed to rockset-read-only October 30, 2024 16:50 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@clee2000 clee2000 temporarily deployed to rockset-read-only October 30, 2024 16:53 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@clee2000 clee2000 temporarily deployed to rockset-read-only October 30, 2024 18:56 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@clee2000 clee2000 temporarily deployed to rockset-read-only October 30, 2024 21:32 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@clee2000 clee2000 marked this pull request as ready for review October 30, 2024 21:44
@clee2000 clee2000 requested a review from a team as a code owner October 30, 2024 21:44
@clee2000 clee2000 changed the title [ch] Move close_nonexistent_disable_issues.py queries to CH Move close_nonexistent_disable_issues.py queries to ClickHouse Oct 30, 2024
push.head_commit.id as sha
FROM
commons.push
-- Not bothering with final here
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I learn from @ZainRizvi that the use (or abuse) of having final on the query could be the reason why some of my queries run OOM. I guess I need to go back and double check some of them

TEST_EXISTS_QUERY = """
select
count(*) as c
name
Copy link
Contributor

@huydhn huydhn Oct 30, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: Why not just count it here like the original query? (I couldn't find what is that name is used for, so I guess it's not needed)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's faster to just find one than to find all of them

@clee2000
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge -f "no trunk needed"

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Please use -f as last resort and instead consider -i/--ignore-current to continue the merge ignoring current failures. This will allow currently pending tests to finish and report signal before the merge.

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants