Skip to content

Conversation

@yf225
Copy link
Contributor

@yf225 yf225 commented Oct 16, 2024

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Oct 16, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/138105

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ You can merge normally! (1 Unrelated Failure)

As of commit d024ced with merge base f95ddf0 (image):

FLAKY - The following job failed but was likely due to flakiness present on trunk:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added oncall: distributed Add this issue/PR to distributed oncall triage queue release notes: distributed (fsdp) release notes category labels Oct 16, 2024
@yf225 yf225 requested review from awgu and xmfan October 16, 2024 19:58
Copy link
Collaborator

@awgu awgu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for cleaning this up!

…ction"

cc XilunWu H-Huang awgu kwen2501 wanchaol fegin fduwjj wz337 wconstab d4l3k c-p-i-o

[ghstack-poisoned]
@yf225 yf225 added keep-going Don't stop on first failure, keep running tests until the end topic: not user facing topic category and removed release notes: distributed (fsdp) release notes category labels Oct 16, 2024
@yf225
Copy link
Contributor Author

yf225 commented Oct 16, 2024

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Oct 16, 2024
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

…ction"

cc XilunWu H-Huang awgu kwen2501 wanchaol fegin fduwjj wz337 wconstab d4l3k c-p-i-o

[ghstack-poisoned]
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: New commits were pushed while merging. Please rerun the merge command.

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

@yf225
Copy link
Contributor Author

yf225 commented Oct 16, 2024

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

…ction"

cc XilunWu H-Huang awgu kwen2501 wanchaol fegin fduwjj wz337 wconstab d4l3k c-p-i-o

[ghstack-poisoned]
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: New commits were pushed while merging. Please rerun the merge command.

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

@yf225
Copy link
Contributor Author

yf225 commented Oct 16, 2024

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

…ction"

cc XilunWu H-Huang awgu kwen2501 wanchaol fegin fduwjj wz337 wconstab d4l3k c-p-i-o

[ghstack-poisoned]
yf225 added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2024
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: New commits were pushed while merging. Please rerun the merge command.

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

@yf225
Copy link
Contributor Author

yf225 commented Oct 16, 2024

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: 1 jobs have failed, first few of them are: trunk / linux-focal-cuda12.4-py3.10-gcc9-sm86 / test (default, 3, 5, linux.g5.4xlarge.nvidia.gpu)

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

@yf225
Copy link
Contributor Author

yf225 commented Oct 17, 2024

@pytorchbot merge -f "unrelated failure"

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Please use -f as last resort and instead consider -i/--ignore-current to continue the merge ignoring current failures. This will allow currently pending tests to finish and report signal before the merge.

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

pytorchmergebot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2024
… to eager (#138113)

Dynamo stance is recently added in #137504. When Dynamo stance is "force_eager" (user explicitly wants to fall back to eager), we would like Compiled Autograd to fall back to eager as well. This will allow the Traceable FSDP2 use case to work since "eager forward + compiled autograd backward" is not supported for Traceable FSDP2.

In general, if user wants to do "eager forward + compiled autograd backward", they should explicitly run the forward in eager instead of applying compile and then set stance to "force_eager".

Pull Request resolved: #138113
Approved by: https://github.com/xmfan
ghstack dependencies: #138105
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the gh/yf225/140/head branch November 16, 2024 02:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request keep-going Don't stop on first failure, keep running tests until the end Merged oncall: distributed Add this issue/PR to distributed oncall triage queue topic: not user facing topic category

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants