Skip to content

Conversation

@swolchok
Copy link
Contributor

@swolchok swolchok commented Oct 15, 2024

This will break once we support 128-bit vectors, and there's no reason to do it.

Differential Revision: [D64421982](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D64421982/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Oct 15, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/138014

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit ef84551 with merge base 0786b37 (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the module: cpu CPU specific problem (e.g., perf, algorithm) label Oct 15, 2024
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D64421982

Copy link
Contributor

@malfet malfet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, just wanted to confirm that Vec::size() is constexpr, perhaps adding an explicit constexpr would be a nice touch

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Oct 15, 2024
…ed_reduction"

This will break once we support 128-bit vectors, and there's no reason to do it.

Differential Revision: [D64421982](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D64421982/)

cc jgong5 mingfeima XiaobingSuper sanchitintel ashokei jingxu10

[ghstack-poisoned]
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D64421982

…] Don't hardcode 4 * Vec::size() in vectorized_reduction"

This will break once we support 128-bit vectors, and there's no reason to do it.

Differential Revision: [D64421982](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D64421982/)

cc jgong5 mingfeima XiaobingSuper sanchitintel ashokei jingxu10

[ghstack-poisoned]
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D64421982

@swolchok
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D64421982

pytorchmergebot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request fb-exported Merged module: cpu CPU specific problem (e.g., perf, algorithm) topic: not user facing topic category

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants