Skip to content

Conversation

@desertfire
Copy link
Contributor

@desertfire desertfire commented Oct 9, 2024

Summary: #137401 didn't fix the underlying inplace output issue.

[ghstack-poisoned]
@desertfire desertfire requested a review from a team as a code owner October 9, 2024 22:31
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Oct 9, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/137660

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit 4431312 with merge base f69bf00 (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

Summary: #137401 didn't fix the underlying inplace output issue.

cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx ipiszy yf225 chenyang78 kadeng muchulee8 ColinPeppler amjames chauhang

[ghstack-poisoned]
Summary: #137401 didn't fix the underlying inplace output issue.

cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx ipiszy yf225 chenyang78 kadeng muchulee8 ColinPeppler amjames chauhang

[ghstack-poisoned]
@desertfire desertfire added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Oct 10, 2024
Copy link

@chenyang78 chenyang78 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Failing test seems to be real.

@desertfire
Copy link
Contributor Author

Failing test seems to be real.

investigating

Summary: #137401 didn't fix the underlying inplace output issue.

cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx ipiszy yf225 chenyang78 kadeng muchulee8 ColinPeppler amjames chauhang

[ghstack-poisoned]
@desertfire desertfire removed the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Oct 10, 2024
Summary: #137401 didn't fix the underlying inplace output issue.

cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx ipiszy yf225 chenyang78 kadeng muchulee8 ColinPeppler amjames chauhang

[ghstack-poisoned]
@desertfire desertfire added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Oct 10, 2024
@desertfire
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: 1 jobs have failed, first few of them are: trunk / linux-focal-cuda12.4-py3.10-gcc9-sm86 / test (default, 5, 5, lf.linux.g5.4xlarge.nvidia.gpu)

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

@desertfire
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge -f "test_cuda_load is flaky"

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Please use -f as last resort and instead consider -i/--ignore-current to continue the merge ignoring current failures. This will allow currently pending tests to finish and report signal before the merge.

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@pytorchbot successfully started a revert job. Check the current status here.
Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@desertfire your PR has been successfully reverted.

facebook-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2024
Summary: Reland #137660 after fixing an internal test failure.

Test Plan: CI

Differential Revision: D64273204
pytorchmergebot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2024
Summary: Reland #137660 after fixing an internal test failure.

Test Plan: CI

Differential Revision: D64273204
@desertfire desertfire closed this Oct 12, 2024
@desertfire desertfire reopened this Oct 13, 2024
facebook-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2024
Summary:

Reland #137660 after fixing an internal test failure.

Test Plan: CI

Reviewed By: chenyang78

Differential Revision: D64273204
Summary: #137401 didn't fix the underlying inplace output issue.

cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx ipiszy yf225 chenyang78 kadeng muchulee8 ColinPeppler amjames chauhang

[ghstack-poisoned]
pytorchmergebot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2024
Summary: Make AOTI generate ABI-compatible code as default for OSS.

Pull Request resolved: #136534
Approved by: https://github.com/chenyang78
ghstack dependencies: #137660
KnAwnime pushed a commit to KnAwnime/Byblioteka that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2024
Summary: pytorch/pytorch#137401 didn't fix the underlying inplace output issue.

ghstack-source-id: 93cc076
Pull Request resolved: pytorch/pytorch#137660
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the gh/desertfire/485/head branch November 13, 2024 02:04
facebook-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 9, 2024
Summary:

Refine #137660 to support fallback op without a return value.

Differential Revision: D66939108
pytorchmergebot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 9, 2024
Summary: Refine #137660 to support fallback op without a return value.

Differential Revision: D66939108

Pull Request resolved: #142339
Approved by: https://github.com/henrylhtsang
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants