Skip to content

Conversation

@masnesral
Copy link
Contributor

@masnesral masnesral commented Sep 10, 2024

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

Summary: Landed #135260 too soon and the test in that PR doesn't do exactly what I tested (actually test different dtypes).

Test Plan: python test/inductor/test_triton_kernels.py -k float64_constant

cc @voznesenskym @penguinwu @EikanWang @jgong5 @Guobing-Chen @XiaobingSuper @zhuhaozhe @blzheng @wenzhe-nrv @jiayisunx @ipiszy @yf225 @chenyang78 @kadeng @muchulee8 @ColinPeppler @amjames @desertfire @chauhang

Summary: Landed #135260 too soon and the test in that PR doesn't do exactly what I tested (actually test different dtypes).

Test Plan: `python test/inductor/test_triton_kernels.py -k float64_constant`

[ghstack-poisoned]
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Sep 10, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/135583

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 1 New Failure, 3 Unrelated Failures

As of commit 64eba68 with merge base f65a564 (image):

NEW FAILURE - The following job has failed:

FLAKY - The following jobs failed but were likely due to flakiness present on trunk:

BROKEN TRUNK - The following job failed but were present on the merge base:

👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

masnesral added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2024
Summary: Landed #135260 too soon and the test in that PR doesn't do exactly what I tested (actually test different dtypes).

Test Plan: `python test/inductor/test_triton_kernels.py -k float64_constant`

ghstack-source-id: 0fbe80d
Pull Request resolved: #135583
@masnesral masnesral requested a review from isuruf September 10, 2024 16:33
@masnesral
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Sep 10, 2024
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: Approvers from one of the following sets are needed:

  • superuser (pytorch/metamates)
  • Core Reviewers (mruberry, lezcano, Skylion007, ngimel, peterbell10, ...)
  • Core Maintainers (soumith, gchanan, ezyang, dzhulgakov, malfet, ...)
Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

Failing merge rule: Core Maintainers

@Skylion007
Copy link
Collaborator

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

Chao1Han pushed a commit to Chao1Han/pytorch that referenced this pull request Sep 20, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the gh/masnesral/114/head branch October 12, 2024 02:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants