-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26.3k
[Retry] Log chromium events to scuba #134118
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/134118
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ✅ No FailuresAs of commit 5d368b3 with merge base 2db28a9 ( This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D61603243 |
Summary: X-link: pytorch/pytorch#134118 For some reason exporting D61392607 is just not working, so I'm resubmitting this. This diff implements a bunch of views for internal scuba viewing. TODOS that I might punt to another diff: - Saving cache stats via counter is definitely sus here, but there's not really a good way to track "fx graph cache hit for this compile phase" right now. Will think about this more. - We should definitely log frame id, compile id, etc - We should definitely be logging configs. That way, we can A/B test based on whether a config is turned on. - idk what I'm doing with compile_uuid yet, but it's useful when you want to look at samples for a single run. I think if we had mast job info this field is not needed, but it's nice to be able to drill down to a single run and get its chrome trace view or icicle view, so idk Reviewed By: oulgen Differential Revision: D61603243
Summary: X-link: pytorch/benchmark#2429 Pull Request resolved: #134118 For some reason exporting D61392607 is just not working, so I'm resubmitting this. This diff implements a bunch of views for internal scuba viewing. TODOS that I might punt to another diff: - Saving cache stats via counter is definitely sus here, but there's not really a good way to track "fx graph cache hit for this compile phase" right now. Will think about this more. - We should definitely log frame id, compile id, etc - We should definitely be logging configs. That way, we can A/B test based on whether a config is turned on. - idk what I'm doing with compile_uuid yet, but it's useful when you want to look at samples for a single run. I think if we had mast job info this field is not needed, but it's nice to be able to drill down to a single run and get its chrome trace view or icicle view, so idk Test Plan: All of the above views are run with nanogpt benchmark: ``` buck run mode/opt caffe2/benchmarks/dynamo:torchbench -- --training --backend=inductor --only nanogpt --performance ``` Reviewed By: oulgen Differential Revision: D61603243
3e16324 to
5d368b3
Compare
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D61603243 |
Summary: Pull Request resolved: pytorch#2429 X-link: pytorch/pytorch#134118 For some reason exporting D61392607 is just not working, so I'm resubmitting this. This diff implements a bunch of views for internal scuba viewing. TODOS that I might punt to another diff: - Saving cache stats via counter is definitely sus here, but there's not really a good way to track "fx graph cache hit for this compile phase" right now. Will think about this more. - We should definitely log frame id, compile id, etc - We should definitely be logging configs. That way, we can A/B test based on whether a config is turned on. - idk what I'm doing with compile_uuid yet, but it's useful when you want to look at samples for a single run. I think if we had mast job info this field is not needed, but it's nice to be able to drill down to a single run and get its chrome trace view or icicle view, so idk Reviewed By: oulgen Differential Revision: D61603243
Summary: Pull Request resolved: #2429 X-link: pytorch/pytorch#134118 For some reason exporting D61392607 is just not working, so I'm resubmitting this. This diff implements a bunch of views for internal scuba viewing. TODOS that I might punt to another diff: - Saving cache stats via counter is definitely sus here, but there's not really a good way to track "fx graph cache hit for this compile phase" right now. Will think about this more. - We should definitely log frame id, compile id, etc - We should definitely be logging configs. That way, we can A/B test based on whether a config is turned on. - idk what I'm doing with compile_uuid yet, but it's useful when you want to look at samples for a single run. I think if we had mast job info this field is not needed, but it's nice to be able to drill down to a single run and get its chrome trace view or icicle view, so idk Reviewed By: oulgen Differential Revision: D61603243 fbshipit-source-id: cf467e75ba16365010f34e9e104039246778c8df
|
@pytorchbot merge -f 'Landed internally' (Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, using force because this PR might not pass merge_rules.json but landed internally) |
Merge startedYour change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Please use Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
Summary: This diff implements a bunch of views for internal scuba viewing. TODOS that I might punt to another diff: - Saving cache stats via counter is definitely sus here, but there's not really a good way to track "fx graph cache hit for this compile phase" right now. Will think about this more. - We should definitely log frame id, compile id, etc - We should definitely be logging configs. That way, we can A/B test based on whether a config is turned on. - idk what I'm doing with compile_uuid yet, but it's useful when you want to look at samples for a single run. I think if we had mast job info this field is not needed, but it's nice to be able to drill down to a single run and get its chrome trace view or icicle view, so idk Test Plan: All of the above views are run with nanogpt benchmark: ``` buck run mode/opt caffe2/benchmarks/dynamo:torchbench -- --training --backend=inductor --only nanogpt --performance ``` Differential Revision: D61603243 Pull Request resolved: pytorch#134118 Approved by: https://github.com/oulgen
Summary:
This diff implements a bunch of views for internal scuba viewing.
TODOS that I might punt to another diff:
Test Plan:
All of the above views are run with nanogpt benchmark:
Differential Revision: D61603243
cc @voznesenskym @penguinwu @EikanWang @jgong5 @Guobing-Chen @XiaobingSuper @zhuhaozhe @blzheng @wenzhe-nrv @jiayisunx @ipiszy @yf225 @chenyang78 @kadeng @muchulee8 @ColinPeppler @amjames @desertfire @chauhang @rec