Skip to content

Conversation

@aorenste
Copy link
Contributor

@aorenste aorenste commented Jul 24, 2024

@aorenste aorenste requested review from albanD and janeyx99 as code owners July 24, 2024 00:04
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Jul 24, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/131583

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ You can merge normally! (5 Unrelated Failures)

As of commit c1f6928 with merge base 1eedb0a (image):

FLAKY - The following jobs failed but were likely due to flakiness present on trunk:

BROKEN TRUNK - The following job failed but were present on the merge base:

👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

This was referenced Jul 24, 2024
)
from torch.utils.hooks import RemovableHandle

_T = TypeVar("_T")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There's a T for TypeVar("T") below -- what does the underscore mean here?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Underscore means the name is private to the file. I could have used the 'T' version as well - but I didn't want to make any implied guarantees about the type name having any external meaning.

Copy link
Contributor

@janeyx99 janeyx99 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks fine, thanks!

Left a q about the underscore

Maykonlincoln pushed a commit to Maykonlincoln/Rede-neural that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2024
See #131429

ghstack-source-id: 4029c13
Pull Request resolved: pytorch/pytorch#131583
@aorenste aorenste added the topic: not user facing topic category label Jul 26, 2024
@aorenste
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge -f "passed tests on #131589 but one PR in the middle of the stack is missing review"

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Please use -f as last resort and instead consider -i/--ignore-current to continue the merge ignoring current failures. This will allow currently pending tests to finish and report signal before the merge.

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@atalman
Copy link
Contributor

atalman commented Jul 26, 2024

@pytorchmergebot revert -c nosignal -m "Breaks CI: GH job link HUD commit link"

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@pytorchbot successfully started a revert job. Check the current status here.
Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@aorenste your PR has been successfully reverted.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants