Skip to content

Conversation

@mikaylagawarecki
Copy link
Contributor

@mikaylagawarecki mikaylagawarecki commented Jul 12, 2024

Based in part on NVIDIA/apex#1774

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

Differential Revision: D60155434

[ghstack-poisoned]
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Jul 12, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/130633

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit 0c18902 with merge base c047bdd (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

[ghstack-poisoned]
mikaylagawarecki added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2024
ghstack-source-id: 92150af
Pull Request resolved: #130633
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
mikaylagawarecki added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2024
ghstack-source-id: dec91e4
Pull Request resolved: #130633
_CUDAToolkit_find_and_add_import_lib(cublas_static DEPS culibos)
endif()

if(CUDAToolkit_VERSION VERSION_GREATER_EQUAL 11.4)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this file vendored from somewhere? Did you take that update from there?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@mikaylagawarecki mikaylagawarecki Jul 15, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok!
Did you update the full thing to 3.25? Or just picked the subset of the changes you needed?
@malfet what do you think is the best way to do this? A full update to a given version to make sure we're not in a weird in-between. Or just what we need to reduce churn?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@mikaylagawarecki mikaylagawarecki Jul 16, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just copy pasted the subset I needed, fwiw I am not sure that the initial file was copy pasted directly as I see this at the top

# This module is back-ported from CMake 3.17 and above to work with CMake 3.10

but around the date where the PR that added this file was merged I don't see a similar comment https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake/-/blob/21b102c77d85897c2500488180e58de077447b4c/Modules/FindCUDAToolkit.cmake

not sure whether there were any changes made/which commit to CMake it was taken from

[ghstack-poisoned]
mikaylagawarecki added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2024
ghstack-source-id: 32b0551
Pull Request resolved: #130633
[ghstack-poisoned]
mikaylagawarecki added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 16, 2024
ghstack-source-id: 55f6610
Pull Request resolved: #130633
[ghstack-poisoned]
@mikaylagawarecki mikaylagawarecki added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Jul 16, 2024
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
mikaylagawarecki added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2024
ghstack-source-id: 2bf34da
Pull Request resolved: #130633
[ghstack-poisoned]
@mikaylagawarecki
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mikaylagawarecki has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

xuhancn pushed a commit to xuhancn/pytorch that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2024
…130633)"

This reverts commit 5b5e069.

Reverted pytorch#130633 on behalf of https://github.com/clee2000 due to breaking a lot of jobs and build rules internally D60085885, possibly needs to update some bazel build? ([comment](pytorch#130633 (comment)))
@mikaylagawarecki
Copy link
Contributor Author

mikaylagawarecki commented Jul 25, 2024

Build failures present on D60085885 do not exist on the imported D60155434 (also verified by running some of the builds locally on the diff and they succeeded), the service_lab signal that is failing previously succeeded so is flaky.

Going to rebase and merge

[ghstack-poisoned]
mikaylagawarecki added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2024
ghstack-source-id: 1ca20ab
Pull Request resolved: #130633
@mikaylagawarecki
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: This PR has internal changes and must be landed via Phabricator! Please try reimporting/rexporting the PR!

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

@mikaylagawarecki
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@clee2000
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot revert -m "still failing internally D60265673" -c ghfirst

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@pytorchbot successfully started a revert job. Check the current status here.
Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@mikaylagawarecki your PR has been successfully reverted.

pytorchmergebot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 26, 2024
pytorchmergebot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 15, 2024
malfet pushed a commit to aditew01/pytorch that referenced this pull request Sep 13, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the gh/mikaylagawarecki/232/head branch September 17, 2024 01:54
Chao1Han pushed a commit to Chao1Han/pytorch that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request Merged Reverted topic: not user facing topic category

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants