Skip to content

Conversation

@ezyang
Copy link
Contributor

@ezyang ezyang commented Feb 9, 2024

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

I'm going to gut this function shortly, and having it all on
InputMetadata is convenient for this purpose.

Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang [email protected]

I'm going to gut this function shortly, and having it all on
InputMetadata is convenient for this purpose.

Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <[email protected]>

[ghstack-poisoned]
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Feb 9, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/119559

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit 03dd3eb with merge base 24bdd03 (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

ezyang added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 9, 2024
I'm going to gut this function shortly, and having it all on
InputMetadata is convenient for this purpose.

Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyangmeta.com>

ghstack-source-id: 2903c05
Pull Request resolved: #119559
Copy link
Collaborator

@albanD albanD left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The name is reversed but otherwise sounds fine.

I'm going to gut this function shortly, and having it all on
InputMetadata is convenient for this purpose.

Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyangmeta.com>

[ghstack-poisoned]
@ezyang ezyang changed the title Refactor out shape test into InputMetadata::maybe_expand Refactor out shape test into InputMetadata::maybe_reduce Feb 12, 2024
ezyang added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2024
I'm going to gut this function shortly, and having it all on
InputMetadata is convenient for this purpose.

Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyangmeta.com>

ghstack-source-id: 8593bca
Pull Request resolved: #119559
@ezyang ezyang added the topic: not user facing topic category label Feb 12, 2024
@ezyang
Copy link
Contributor Author

ezyang commented Feb 12, 2024

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Feb 12, 2024
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

pytorchmergebot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2024
clee2000 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2024
I'm going to gut this function shortly, and having it all on
InputMetadata is convenient for this purpose.

Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <[email protected]>
Pull Request resolved: #119559
Approved by: https://github.com/soulitzer
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the gh/ezyang/2566/head branch March 14, 2024 01:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request Merged topic: not user facing topic category

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants