Skip to content

Conversation

@peterbell10
Copy link
Collaborator

@peterbell10 peterbell10 commented Aug 9, 2023

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Aug 9, 2023

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/106915

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ 1 Unrelated Failure

As of commit a70e5d4 with merge base d395088 (image):

UNSTABLE - The following job failed but was likely due to flakiness present on trunk and has been marked as unstable:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the module: cpu CPU specific problem (e.g., perf, algorithm) label Aug 9, 2023
cc jgong5 mingfeima XiaobingSuper sanchitintel ashokei jingxu10

[ghstack-poisoned]
cc jgong5 mingfeima XiaobingSuper sanchitintel ashokei jingxu10

[ghstack-poisoned]
cc jgong5 mingfeima XiaobingSuper sanchitintel ashokei jingxu10

[ghstack-poisoned]
peterbell10 added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2023
ghstack-source-id: 7c69230
Pull Request resolved: #106915
cc jgong5 mingfeima XiaobingSuper sanchitintel ashokei jingxu10

[ghstack-poisoned]
peterbell10 added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 17, 2023
ghstack-source-id: c53f059
Pull Request resolved: #106915
@peterbell10 peterbell10 marked this pull request as ready for review August 18, 2023 01:19
@peterbell10 peterbell10 requested a review from lezcano August 18, 2023 01:19
@peterbell10
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Aug 18, 2023
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: This PR needs a release notes: label
If your changes are user facing and intended to be a part of release notes, please use a label starting with release notes:.

If not, please add the topic: not user facing label.

To add a label, you can comment to pytorchbot, for example
@pytorchbot label "topic: not user facing"

For more information, see
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/wiki/PyTorch-AutoLabel-Bot#why-categorize-for-release-notes-and-how-does-it-work.

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

@peterbell10
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

The merge job was canceled. If you believe this is a mistake,then you can re trigger it through pytorch-bot.

@peterbell10
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@peterbell10 your PR has been successfully reverted.

pytorchmergebot added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 23, 2023
This reverts commit 4f3284e.

Reverted #106915 on behalf of https://github.com/ZainRizvi due to reverting the full stack. I missed that the iostream pr was stacked under this one and it's builds are also failing internally ([comment](#106915 (comment)))
@peterbell10 peterbell10 reopened this Aug 23, 2023
@peterbell10
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Depending on implicit imports for a pre-compiled header is really bad practice, there should ideally be a CI job building without PCH to prevent that.

cc jgong5 mingfeima XiaobingSuper sanchitintel ashokei jingxu10

[ghstack-poisoned]
peterbell10 added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 23, 2023
ghstack-source-id: 1c94456
Pull Request resolved: #106915
@kit1980
Copy link
Contributor

kit1980 commented Aug 25, 2023

@kit1980 has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

1 similar comment
@kit1980
Copy link
Contributor

kit1980 commented Aug 25, 2023

@kit1980 has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@kit1980
Copy link
Contributor

kit1980 commented Aug 25, 2023

@kit1980 has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@kit1980
Copy link
Contributor

kit1980 commented Aug 25, 2023

I'm re-landing the stack, internal builds look fine to me now.

@kit1980
Copy link
Contributor

kit1980 commented Aug 25, 2023

@pytorchbot merge -f "Re-landing after ghfirst revert"

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Please use -f as last resort and instead consider -i/--ignore-current to continue the merge ignoring current failures. This will allow currently pending tests to finish and report signal before the merge.

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@osalpekar
Copy link
Member

@pytorchbot revert -m "Unfortunately there is still a breaking Metal job due to the bottom PR. @kit1980 will help fix this and get this merged" -c ghfirst

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@pytorchbot successfully started a revert job. Check the current status here.
Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@peterbell10 your PR has been successfully reverted.

pytorchmergebot added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 28, 2023
This reverts commit c68d0a7.

Reverted #106915 on behalf of https://github.com/osalpekar due to Unfortunately there is still a breaking Metal job due to the bottom PR. @kit1980 will help fix this and get this merged ([comment](#106915 (comment)))
@huydhn huydhn mentioned this pull request Aug 29, 2023
pytorchmergebot referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2023
Summary: Replaced by std::array

Test Plan: Sandcastle

Differential Revision: D48160261

Pull Request resolved: #106810
Approved by: https://github.com/peterbell10
pytorchmergebot added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2023
This reverts commit 39297eb.

Reverted #106810 on behalf of https://github.com/huydhn due to Sorry for reverting your PR but the build is failing precompiled header build in trunk due to a landrace with the revert of #106915 ([comment](#106810 (comment)))
@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/peterbell10/597/head branch August 29, 2023 14:17
@peterbell10 peterbell10 restored the gh/peterbell10/597/head branch August 29, 2023 14:32
@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/peterbell10/597/head branch August 30, 2023 14:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request Merged module: cpu CPU specific problem (e.g., perf, algorithm) open source Reverted topic: not user facing topic category

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants