Skip to content

Conversation

@njsmith
Copy link
Member

@njsmith njsmith commented Jun 9, 2020

This is probably easiest to review in one-commit-at-a-time mode

Alternative to #1579

Fixes #1587

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 9, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #1588 into master will decrease coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1588      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   99.69%   99.69%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         111      110       -1     
  Lines       13869    13849      -20     
  Branches     1060     1056       -4     
==========================================
- Hits        13827    13807      -20     
  Misses         27       27              
  Partials       15       15              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
trio/tests/test_testing.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)
trio/_core/__init__.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
trio/_core/_mock_clock.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
trio/_core/_run.py 99.76% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
trio/_core/tests/test_guest_mode.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
trio/_core/tests/test_mock_clock.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
trio/testing/__init__.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
trio/tests/test_exports.py 97.22% <0.00%> (-0.15%) ⬇️
trio/__init__.py 100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
trio/_threads.py 100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 4 more

Copy link
Member

@oremanj oremanj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice! I agree that this seems a better path forward than #1579. A few small suggestions; feel free to merge once you've addressed to your satisfaction.

@njsmith njsmith force-pushed the autojump-without-a-task branch from 6fa1435 to 6b4341c Compare June 9, 2020 23:16
@njsmith njsmith merged commit eadb499 into python-trio:master Jun 9, 2020
@njsmith njsmith deleted the autojump-without-a-task branch June 9, 2020 23:50
njsmith added a commit to njsmith/trio that referenced this pull request Jun 10, 2020
It was only added for the autojump clock, it wasn't very good at that,
and since python-triogh-1588, the autojump clock doesn't even use it anyway.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Getting rid of the autojump task

2 participants