provider: do not iterate over sets for more deterministic results#10276
provider: do not iterate over sets for more deterministic results#10276radoering merged 1 commit intopython-poetry:mainfrom
Conversation
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis pull request addresses potential non-deterministic behavior in the solver by sorting sets before iterating over them. Specifically, it sorts the No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation. File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey @radoering - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- It's great to see efforts to ensure deterministic behavior in the solver.
- Consider adding a comment explaining why sorting is necessary for these specific iterations.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟢 General issues: all looks good
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
8f70f66 to
f53a1eb
Compare
Secrus
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just a small question, otherwise LGTM
f53a1eb to
fb3643d
Compare
|
This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs. |
Remove potential sources of non-determinism.
Summary by Sourcery
Enhancements: