Skip to content

Interested in supporting PEP 665? #4710

@brettcannon

Description

@brettcannon
  • I have searched the issues of this repo and believe that this is not a duplicate.
  • I have searched the documentation and believe that my question is not covered.

Issue

I'm writing to all of the major packaging projects to see if they would be willing to give me a quote of support for PEP 665? For Poetry this could mean two things:

  1. Eventually replacing Poetry.lock with what the PEP defines.
  2. Support for exporting to what the PEP defines.

The current draft and discussion is at https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-665-take-2-a-file-format-to-list-python-dependencies-for-reproducibility-of-an-application/11736 . If Poetry would be interested in stating that the project supports the PEP (in some form), could you please let me know or leave a comment on Discourse?

Thanks!

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    area/pepsRelated to PEP support/compliancekind/featureFeature requests/implementations

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions