Skip to content

bpo-43407: Docs: Clarify comparisons of time.monotonic() et al results#24757

Merged
terryjreedy merged 1 commit intopython:masterfrom
moreati:issue-43407
Mar 6, 2021
Merged

bpo-43407: Docs: Clarify comparisons of time.monotonic() et al results#24757
terryjreedy merged 1 commit intopython:masterfrom
moreati:issue-43407

Conversation

@moreati
Copy link
Contributor

@moreati moreati commented Mar 4, 2021

Previous wording implied that only the result of call N and N+1 could be
meaningfully compared. Whereas comparing call N and N+M is fine.

https://bugs.python.org/issue43407

Previous wording implied that only the result of call N and N+1 could be
meaningfully compared. Whereas comparing call N and N+M is fine.
@terryjreedy
Copy link
Member

Alex, thank you for having a validated CLA signing before submitting this, your first PR for this repository.

There might be even better wording, but this is an improvement and likely not worth extended bikeshedding.

@terryjreedy terryjreedy merged commit ff5f059 into python:master Mar 6, 2021
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @moreati for the PR, and @terryjreedy for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.8, 3.9.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Sorry @moreati and @terryjreedy, I had trouble checking out the 3.9 backport branch.
Please backport using cherry_picker on command line.
cherry_picker ff5f05934db241dfafc604989b2de3487b09ca82 3.9

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2021
…honGH-24757)

Previous wording implied that only the result of call N and N+1 could be
meaningfully compared, whereas comparing call N and N+M is fine.
(cherry picked from commit ff5f059)

Co-authored-by: Alex Willmer <[email protected]>
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-24768 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.8 branch.

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @moreati for the PR, and @terryjreedy for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.9.
🐍🍒⛏🤖 I'm not a witch! I'm not a witch!

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2021
…honGH-24757)

Previous wording implied that only the result of call N and N+1 could be
meaningfully compared, whereas comparing call N and N+M is fine.
(cherry picked from commit ff5f059)

Co-authored-by: Alex Willmer <[email protected]>
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-24769 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.9 branch.

miss-islington added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2021
…24757)

Previous wording implied that only the result of call N and N+1 could be
meaningfully compared, whereas comparing call N and N+M is fine.
(cherry picked from commit ff5f059)

Co-authored-by: Alex Willmer <[email protected]>
miss-islington added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2021
…24757)

Previous wording implied that only the result of call N and N+1 could be
meaningfully compared, whereas comparing call N and N+M is fine.
(cherry picked from commit ff5f059)

Co-authored-by: Alex Willmer <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

docs Documentation in the Doc dir

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants