Support simple SPDX license expressions (PEP 639)#712
Merged
Conversation
This was referenced Feb 4, 2025
cdce8p
reviewed
Feb 7, 2025
Co-authored-by: Marc Mueller <[email protected]>
cdce8p
reviewed
Feb 7, 2025
Member
cdce8p
left a comment
cdce8p
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should have annotated all cases 😅
Member
Author
|
Ah, I should have looked at the diff view again. Thank you! |
Co-authored-by: Marc Mueller <[email protected]>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This follows on from #707. I plan to allow simple license expressions initially - referring to one license and no exceptions - but validate & normalise them properly. Compound license expressions can be added later.