-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update hashes for Python 3.14.0a5 tarballs #3196
Conversation
C.F.: #3194 I had gotten:
That prompted downloading the 2 tarballs and hashing them to get this fix. I tested the |
Aha! The reason: https://discuss.python.org/t/python-3-14-0-alpha-5/80364/3 Python mutated their release. Not cool. This person spoke for me it seems: https://discuss.python.org/t/python-3-14-0-alpha-5/80364/6 |
Good thing I didn't make a release yet! 🙂 |
I apologise. It took three spins for this release so we decided it was okay for an alpha. Will be more careful next time, and this won't happen for beta and later releases. |
I thought whether to include this PR into release notes. Ultimately, reasoned that we ought to credit @jsirois for a critical fix so yes but chose a more neutral phrasing to avoid drawing unnecessary attention to the mistake. |
@hugovk thanks for chiming in. I'm not really concerned with your action per se, but it is disturbing that a >30 year old language has a release process that even permits mutation at all. I do understand though that Python is under-sourced. |
Make sure you have checked all steps below.
Prerequisite
Description
Tests