Skip to content

Attempt to reproduce #7079 in CI #7488

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
dcherian merged 15 commits into from
Sep 19, 2023
Merged

Attempt to reproduce #7079 in CI #7488

dcherian merged 15 commits into from
Sep 19, 2023

Conversation

@jhamman
Copy link
Member

@jhamman jhamman commented Jan 30, 2023 •
edited
Loading

@github-actions github-actions bot added CI Continuous Integration tools dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file labels Jan 30, 2023
@andersy005 andersy005 mentioned this pull request Jan 30, 2023
Open
4 tasks
@dcherian dcherian mentioned this pull request Mar 24, 2023
Merged
jhamman
jhamman commented Sep 19, 2023
View reviewed changes
@github-actions github-actions bot removed CI Continuous Integration tools dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file labels Sep 19, 2023
@jhamman jhamman marked this pull request as ready for review September 19, 2023 23:23
@jhamman
Copy link
Member Author

jhamman commented Sep 19, 2023

This is an old PR that never quite reproduced the error described in #7079. Nevertheless, I think we should merge it as it does improve our coverage with dask + parallel=True + open_mfdataset.

@dcherian dcherian merged commit 99f8446 into pydata:main Sep 19, 2023
@jhamman jhamman deleted the hdf-lock-issue branch September 20, 2023 00:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@jhamman @dcherian