Remove xfail marker on a PEP 649 related test
#12609
Merged
+0
−6
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Deploying pydantic-docs with
|
| Latest commit: |
0273cef
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://4da87437.pydantic-docs.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://vp-unfail-test.pydantic-docs.pages.dev |
CodSpeed Performance ReportMerging #12609 will not alter performanceComparing Summary
|
Contributor
Coverage report
This PR does not seem to contain any modification to coverable code. |
davidhewitt
approved these changes
Dec 4, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Change Summary
Thanks to python/cpython#138164 (included in 3.14.1), Python is now able to preserve references when building the forward ref object, and so calling
_eval_type()on the individual annotations works as expected.Related issue number
Checklist