Update CI for the new staticnode location#13305
Merged
reaperhulk merged 2 commits intopyca:mainfrom Aug 15, 2025
Merged
Conversation
Member
Author
|
@sandeepgupta12 sorry to keep bothering you -- it looks like the ppc64 runners have a different behavior with mounts than the GH hosted runners. Is this expected? (We realize in some sense we're doing something that's probably not expected here, but we've found it's necessary to keep things working in teh manylinux containers) |
Member
Author
reaperhulk
approved these changes
Aug 15, 2025
Contributor
|
I have created the infra issue for this- IBM/actionspz#35 |
1 similar comment
Contributor
|
I have created the infra issue for this- IBM/actionspz#35 |
Member
Author
|
Thanks!
…On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 7:18 AM Sandeep Gupta ***@***.***> wrote:
*sandeepgupta12* left a comment (pyca/cryptography#13305)
<#13305 (comment)>
I have created the infra issue for this- IBM/actionspz#35
<IBM/actionspz#35>
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#13305 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAAGBDF6KK72KP62H4JGUL3OGZAJAVCNFSM6AAAAACD6REX2OVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZTCOJWGIZTEOBXGQ>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
--
All that is necessary for evil to succeed is for good people to do nothing.
|
Contributor
|
@alex, we have fixed the node 24 issue on ppc64le runner. Can you please try to build it and let me know if issue still persists. |
alex
added a commit
to alex/cryptography
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 1, 2025
* Update CI for the new staticnode location * get CI green
reaperhulk
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 1, 2025
* Add SSL_set_info_callback function declaration (#13375) we need this to have a `set_info_callback` on an SSL.Connection which twisted needs for reasons I don't understand * prep for a 45.0.7 releaes * Update CI for the new staticnode location (#13305) * Update CI for the new staticnode location * get CI green
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.