Repository navigation
False credit reporting for openrouter #9
Description
Actually it's 2-in-1 issues:
1st. try to use this cheap model for example xiaomi/mimo-v2-pro use something like 20cents or so as reported by soulforge, check openrouter account - use dedicated key for soulforge to avoid conflict - you'll usually find that credit is spent is around double this amount ~40cents for example.
This is similar to this issue reported by me too anomalyco/opencode#20937
2nd issue which is funny, it's counting credit for free model :) , check screenshot, confirmed on openrouter showing no Spend activity at all despite Tokens and Requests activity for the same time frame.
Activity
proxysoul commentedon Apr 4, 2026
will take a look at 1.
for 2nd soulforge always counts as fallback based on tokens for estimation if there are no real numbers reported! pretty hard to always guess which models are free and which are not etc.. so its "safer" that way
Jaaaky commentedon Apr 4, 2026
for 2nd, if no real number reported and model name has "free" in its name, can we assume zero credit spent?
proxysoul commentedon Apr 4, 2026
thats okay to do then could be fragile just regex matching "free" but can do that !
Jaaaky commentedon Apr 4, 2026
For openrouter it's standardized like this
qwen/qwen3.6-plus:freeso model name ends with ':free' good for regex match.Doing this search on https://models.dev/?search=free .. for all providers it either ends with '-free' or ':free' .. Along with no credit spent reporting, so it's fair I think.
Jaaaky commentedon Apr 4, 2026
Nice
fix: accurate OpenRouter cost reporting and free model detection
proxysoul commentedon Apr 4, 2026
@Jaaaky the release is building! test again
Jaaaky commentedon Apr 4, 2026
Yes! Both solved. Well done. So nice and promising for a new project!