Skip to content

fix(bazel/python): incompatible_enable_proto_toolchain_resolution#17078

Closed
alexeagle wants to merge 1 commit intoprotocolbuffers:mainfrom
alexeagle:py_proto_toolchain
Closed

fix(bazel/python): incompatible_enable_proto_toolchain_resolution#17078
alexeagle wants to merge 1 commit intoprotocolbuffers:mainfrom
alexeagle:py_proto_toolchain

Conversation

@alexeagle
Copy link
Collaborator

This was originally landed in bazel-contrib/rules_python#1577 However the fork of py_proto_library brought to the protobuf repo was from an earlier commit: 8257c44 (cl/623401031 for googlers)
Thus the fix was lost. This PR simply cherry-picks that change.

This was originally landed in bazel-contrib/rules_python#1577
However the fork of py_proto_library brought to the protobuf repo was from an earlier commit:
8257c44
(cl/623401031 for googlers)
Thus the fix was lost. This PR simply cherry-picks that change.
@mkruskal-google mkruskal-google added the 🅰️ safe for tests Mark a commit as safe to run presubmits over label Jun 7, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the 🅰️ safe for tests Mark a commit as safe to run presubmits over label Jun 7, 2024
@alexeagle
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Note, @mkruskal-google agrees that the one test failure here is a known flake.

TinyTinni pushed a commit to TinyTinni/protobuf that referenced this pull request Jun 15, 2024
…otocolbuffers#17078)

This was originally landed in bazel-contrib/rules_python#1577 However the fork of py_proto_library brought to the protobuf repo was from an earlier commit: protocolbuffers@8257c44 (cl/623401031 for googlers)
Thus the fix was lost. This PR simply cherry-picks that change.

Closes protocolbuffers#17078

COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=protocolbuffers#17078 from alexeagle:py_proto_toolchain 226540e
PiperOrigin-RevId: 642123868
deannagarcia pushed a commit to deannagarcia/protobuf that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2024
…otocolbuffers#17078)

This was originally landed in bazel-contrib/rules_python#1577 However the fork of py_proto_library brought to the protobuf repo was from an earlier commit: protocolbuffers@8257c44 (cl/623401031 for googlers)
Thus the fix was lost. This PR simply cherry-picks that change.

Closes protocolbuffers#17078

COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=protocolbuffers#17078 from alexeagle:py_proto_toolchain 226540e
PiperOrigin-RevId: 642123868
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants