-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
Indent long ConditionalExpression in MemberExpression
#7564
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ | ||
| #### Indent long `ConditionalExpression` in `MemberExpression` ([#7564](https://github.com/prettier/prettier/pull/7564) by [@fisker](https://github.com/fisker)) | ||
|
|
||
| <!-- prettier-ignore --> | ||
| ```js | ||
| // Input | ||
| (a.very.long.very.long.very.long.very.long.very.long.conditional.expression?foo:bar).baz; | ||
|
|
||
| // Prettier stable | ||
| (a.very.long.very.long.very.long.very.long.very.long.conditional.expression | ||
| ? foo | ||
| : bar | ||
| ).baz; | ||
|
|
||
| // Prettier master | ||
| ( | ||
| a.very.long.very.long.very.long.very.long.very.long.conditional.expression | ||
| ? foo | ||
| : bar | ||
| ).baz; | ||
| ``` |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ | ||
| function foo (){ | ||
| return ( | ||
| a | ||
| ? looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong1 | ||
| : looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong2 | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| function foo (){ | ||
| return ( | ||
| a | ||
| ? looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong1 | ||
| : looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong2 | ||
| ).foo; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| function foo (){ | ||
| return ( | ||
| a | ||
| ? looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong1 | ||
| : looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong2 | ||
| ).foo(); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // #4976 | ||
| const decorated = ((arg, ignoreRequestError) => { | ||
| return ( | ||
| typeof arg === 'string' || (arg && arg.valueOf && typeof arg.valueOf() === 'string') | ||
| ? $delegate(arg, ignoreRequestError) | ||
| : handleAsyncOperations(arg, ignoreRequestError)).foo(); | ||
| }); |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we really want to change the formatting in these simpler cases where the condition fits on one line?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You mean this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems I didn't change much, only difference is one line after
(.#7564
stable
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I mean this. Looks more questionable when it's part of expression (stable).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also this problem exists in
returnstatements. Can be solved by adding parens. Or it's probably better to find a generic way to increase the indentation of?and:if the condition (the part before?) doesn't fit on one line.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Personal I prefer new one, we are not running
+with the ternary, we are calculating with(ternary).fooThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Like this?
This seems weird....
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's what I meant:
I propose that the indentation level of the second and the third arguments of the conditional operator should depend on how many lines the first argument takes.