Skip to content

Formatting of generators changed without sufficient consensus #7512

@glen-84

Description

@glen-84

I noted in #3903 that the formatting of generators was recently changed based on an issue (#7028) that had a total of just 2 up-votes (excluding the OP's).

I was under the impression that such changes would require far more consensus and motivation. There are issues with many more votes that have not yet even been considered.

I'm opening this issue to suggest that the relevant changes be reverted until a proper process has been followed.

FWIW, the original arguments didn't seem that compelling to me, but ultimately this is a very subjective matter and there isn't really a right or wrong answer. However, the change should only be made if there are either objective reasons to do so, or a really high percentage of votes in favour of the change.

I'd like to avoid discussing the pros and cons in this issue, as that can be done elsewhere.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    lang:javascriptIssues affecting JSlocked-due-to-inactivityPlease open a new issue and fill out the template instead of commenting.status:needs discussionIssues needing discussion and a decision to be made before action can be taken

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions