Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix prefix for SMISMEMBER #1468

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 2, 2024
Merged

Fix prefix for SMISMEMBER #1468

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 2, 2024

Conversation

mohorev
Copy link
Contributor

@mohorev mohorev commented Jun 28, 2024

Description:

When using the SMISMEMBER command, it has been observed that the client's prefix is ignored. This leads to incorrect membership checks within a set, as the key passed to the command does not include the prefix specified for the client.

Changes:

  • Updated the handling of the SMISMEMBER command to include the client's prefix in the key.
  • Added tests to verify correct behavior of the command with a prefix.

Additional Information:

Predis Version: v2.2.2

@mohorev mohorev requested a review from tillkruss as a code owner June 28, 2024 15:23
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

coverage: 80.293% (+0.004%) from 80.289%
when pulling b376c9b on mohorev:smismember-key
into cbef710 on predis:v2.x.

@tillkruss
Copy link
Member

@vladvildanov Good?

@mohorev
Copy link
Contributor Author

mohorev commented Jul 2, 2024

@tillkruss @vladvildanov I rebased my branch from v2.x because code style issues are already fixed in the base branch.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

coverage: 80.293% (+0.004%) from 80.289%
when pulling 0aa0d70 on mohorev:smismember-key
into c5fdfc8 on predis:v2.x.

@tillkruss tillkruss added the bug label Jul 2, 2024
@tillkruss tillkruss merged commit 5d22ed7 into predis:v2.x Jul 2, 2024
68 checks passed
@mohorev mohorev deleted the smismember-key branch July 3, 2024 08:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants