Conversation
MakisH
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks a lot for contributing! This is something we always wanted to have.
I added a few comments. Most of them should be very easy to implement, but we need to convert the case to use Stress instead of Force. I am not sure how to do that in CalculiX.
| @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ | |||
| *INCLUDE, INPUT=turekflapcurved.msh | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What does the "curved" part mean here?
It would be nice to document this case in the README.md of the turek-hron-fsi3/ directory.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It was just a personal tag for the different meshes that I've been used.
I will rename it.
| . ../../tools/cleaning-tools.sh | ||
|
|
||
| clean_calculix . | ||
| rm log-solid |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Where does the log-solid come from? I don't see this in the run.sh.
In any case, when calling rm, it is a good idea to call it as rm -f, so that it does not complain when the file is not there.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
My bad! The log-solid came from the batch script of the cluster. I will update the run.sh file.
| @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ | |||
| #!/bin/sh | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The run.sh and clean.sh files are not marked as executable at the moment. Please do chmod +x run.sh clean.sh.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Alright, I don't know why it was not adopted.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Did you at any step compress these files into a .zip? I have noticed in the past that this removed file permissions.
| interfaces: | ||
| - nodes-mesh: Solid-Mesh | ||
| patch: surface | ||
| read-data: [Force] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Running this case, I get:
ERROR: Data with name "Force" is not defined on mesh "Solid-Mesh". Please add <use-data name="Force"/> under <mesh name="Solid-Mesh"/>.
Note that this case now uses stress instead of force. This will probably need a bit of work to convert, but it should be doable.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That is right, I have to dig a bit deeper for this. But first I would like to get the case running.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Don't hesitate to ask for help, this is almost there and we could merge it soon! 😄
|
This pull request has been mentioned on preCICE Forum on Discourse. There might be relevant details there: |
|
Superceded by #304 |
The CalculiX files from my successful FSI3 case with OpenFOAM and CalculiX.
It has to be noted, that the z-direction from the mesh is smaller than the one from the tutorial case with deal.ii.
Also, there may be some differences regarding the OpenFoam side. I can upload those too.