Skip to content

Add error handling for failed transaction#10

Merged
Maciuch merged 2 commits intopmem:3.2-nvmlfrom
ldorau:Add-error-handling-for-failed-transaction
Nov 23, 2017
Merged

Add error handling for failed transaction#10
Maciuch merged 2 commits intopmem:3.2-nvmlfrom
ldorau:Add-error-handling-for-failed-transaction

Conversation

@ldorau
Copy link
Member

@ldorau ldorau commented Oct 31, 2017

This change is Reviewable

@ldorau ldorau force-pushed the Add-error-handling-for-failed-transaction branch 4 times, most recently from 429e555 to 04d001c Compare October 31, 2017 13:53
@ldorau ldorau force-pushed the Add-error-handling-for-failed-transaction branch from 04d001c to 3b9411e Compare October 31, 2017 13:55
@krzycz
Copy link

krzycz commented Oct 31, 2017

Reviewed 2 of 2 files at r1.
Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, all discussions resolved.


Comments from Reviewable

Maciuch pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 23, 2017
…saction

Add error handling for failed transaction
@Maciuch Maciuch merged commit a1de5b9 into pmem:3.2-nvml Nov 23, 2017
@Maciuch Maciuch merged commit 3b9411e into pmem:3.2-nvml Nov 23, 2017
@ldorau ldorau deleted the Add-error-handling-for-failed-transaction branch November 23, 2017 15:30
michalbiesek pushed a commit to michalbiesek/redis that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2020
michalbiesek pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 8, 2020
PatKamin pushed a commit to PatKamin/redis that referenced this pull request Jul 13, 2022
4.0.2 devel non doc pieces for deployment
michalbiesek pushed a commit to michalbiesek/redis that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2023
…is missed cases to redis-server. (redis#12322)

Observed that the sanitizer reported memory leak as clean up is not done
before the process termination in negative/following cases:

**- when we passed '--invalid' as option to redis-server.**

```
 -vm:~/mem-leak-issue/redis$ ./src/redis-server --invalid

*** FATAL CONFIG FILE ERROR (Redis 255.255.255) ***
Reading the configuration file, at line 2
>>> 'invalid'
Bad directive or wrong number of arguments

=================================================================
==865778==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks

Direct leak of 8 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x7f0985f65867 in __interceptor_malloc ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:145
    #1 0x558ec86686ec in ztrymalloc_usable_internal /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/zmalloc.c:117
    pmem#2 0x558ec86686ec in ztrymalloc_usable /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/zmalloc.c:135
    pmem#3 0x558ec86686ec in ztryrealloc_usable_internal /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/zmalloc.c:276
    pmem#4 0x558ec86686ec in zrealloc /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/zmalloc.c:327
    pmem#5 0x558ec865dd7e in sdssplitargs /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/sds.c:1172
    pmem#6 0x558ec87a1be7 in loadServerConfigFromString /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/config.c:472
    pmem#7 0x558ec87a13b3 in loadServerConfig /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/config.c:718
    pmem#8 0x558ec85e6f15 in main /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/server.c:7258
    pmem#9 0x7f09856e5d8f in __libc_start_call_main ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58

SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 8 byte(s) leaked in 1 allocation(s).

```

**- when we pass '--port' as option and missed to add port number to redis-server.**

```
vm:~/mem-leak-issue/redis$ ./src/redis-server --port

*** FATAL CONFIG FILE ERROR (Redis 255.255.255) ***
Reading the configuration file, at line 2
>>> 'port'
wrong number of arguments

=================================================================
==865846==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks

Direct leak of 8 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x7fdcdbb1f867 in __interceptor_malloc ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:145
    #1 0x557e8b04f6ec in ztrymalloc_usable_internal /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/zmalloc.c:117
    pmem#2 0x557e8b04f6ec in ztrymalloc_usable /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/zmalloc.c:135
    pmem#3 0x557e8b04f6ec in ztryrealloc_usable_internal /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/zmalloc.c:276
    pmem#4 0x557e8b04f6ec in zrealloc /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/zmalloc.c:327
    pmem#5 0x557e8b044d7e in sdssplitargs /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/sds.c:1172
    pmem#6 0x557e8b188be7 in loadServerConfigFromString /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/config.c:472
    pmem#7 0x557e8b1883b3 in loadServerConfig /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/config.c:718
    pmem#8 0x557e8afcdf15 in main /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/server.c:7258
    pmem#9 0x7fdcdb29fd8f in __libc_start_call_main ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58

Indirect leak of 10 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x7fdcdbb1fc18 in __interceptor_realloc ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:164
    #1 0x557e8b04f9aa in ztryrealloc_usable_internal /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/zmalloc.c:287
    pmem#2 0x557e8b04f9aa in ztryrealloc_usable /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/zmalloc.c:317
    pmem#3 0x557e8b04f9aa in zrealloc_usable /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/zmalloc.c:342
    pmem#4 0x557e8b033f90 in _sdsMakeRoomFor /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/sds.c:271
    pmem#5 0x557e8b033f90 in sdsMakeRoomFor /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/sds.c:295
    pmem#6 0x557e8b033f90 in sdscatlen /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/sds.c:486
    pmem#7 0x557e8b044e1f in sdssplitargs /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/sds.c:1165
    pmem#8 0x557e8b188be7 in loadServerConfigFromString /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/config.c:472
    pmem#9 0x557e8b1883b3 in loadServerConfig /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/config.c:718
    pmem#10 0x557e8afcdf15 in main /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/server.c:7258
    pmem#11 0x7fdcdb29fd8f in __libc_start_call_main ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58

SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 18 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s).

```

As part analysis found that the sdsfreesplitres is not called when this condition checks are being hit.

Output after the fix:


```
vm:~/mem-leak-issue/redis$ ./src/redis-server --invalid

*** FATAL CONFIG FILE ERROR (Redis 255.255.255) ***
Reading the configuration file, at line 2
>>> 'invalid'
Bad directive or wrong number of arguments
vm:~/mem-leak-issue/redis$

===========================================
vm:~/mem-leak-issue/redis$ ./src/redis-server --jdhg

*** FATAL CONFIG FILE ERROR (Redis 255.255.255) ***
Reading the configuration file, at line 2
>>> 'jdhg'
Bad directive or wrong number of arguments

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
vm:~/mem-leak-issue/redis$ ./src/redis-server --port

*** FATAL CONFIG FILE ERROR (Redis 255.255.255) ***
Reading the configuration file, at line 2
>>> 'port'
wrong number of arguments
```

Co-authored-by: Oran Agra <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants