💭 I'm spotting a violation in the new GitHub GraphQL budget module—it's using a mutable singleton Map at the module level that gets imported directly into a service's make function, which hides dependencies instead of declaring them properly through Effect. The code also suppresses diagnostics around Date.now() calls, mixing imperative state mutations with what should be pure service construction.… I'm identifying the main issues with the code structure. The githubGraphQlBudget is a module-level mutable singleton being used inside GitHubPullRequestCli.make, which violates the principle of not hiding dependencies in module globals or closures. Additionally, the code relies on Date.now() instead of using the Effect Clock service, and this should be refactored as a proper Effect service using Context.Service with appropriate make and layer implementations. The test file compounds this problem by resetting the global state in afterEach, which exposes the coupling between tests and shared mutable state. Beyond that, the code manufactures an Error just to populate the cause field — since this failure is a locally-decided pause rather than an underlying error, creating a synthetic Error erases the actual structure. I should flag that reusing GitHubCliRateLimitError with a manufactured Error is misleading (the message claims "GitHub CLI failed" when no CLI actually ran), and a dedicated error class like GitHubGraphQlBudgetPausedError would better represent what's actually happening. The resetAt context is also buried inside a string message instead of being captured as a structured field, which loses the stable serializable domain context. The interface GitHubGraphQlBudget itself… The new module violates dependency injection principles since it's a process-wide mutable singleton with hidden state that gets consumed directly in the … I'm seeing two code violations here. First, there's a hidden dependency in the module global—a mutable state with Date.nowbeing consumed inside a service, which directly contradicts the convention about composing resources in an application-owned layer and passing context to runtimes. Second, the code is manufacturing anErrorobject just to populate a cause field, and cramming structured context like host and resetAt into the message string instead of following proper error construction patterns. Looking at the rest of the codebase, the React components and pure helpers check out fine. The test imports are correct, but I notice the new module import style uses a named import of a singleton value—if this gets converted to a service, it should switch to a namespace import, which ties back to the first finding. I'm also scanning through the other files likews.tsand checking the PullRequestProvider for any similar issues. Now I need to identify the exact line numbers for inline comments on the PR diff. The first finding should targetgithubGraphQlBudget.tslines 90-94 where the singleton is exported, and the second finding goes onGitHubPullRequestCli.tslines 930-938, specifically around line 935 where the new Error is created. Both of these are in the added lines of the diff, so I can place comments there. I'm drafting the first comment now to explain how the process-wide mutable state becomes a hidden dependency of the service'smake` method.…

1. modify_pr — Two Effect service convention issues in the new GraphQL budget path. Details inline.