💭 Inspecting files and conflicts I need to inspect two files, ensuring there are no issues regarding usage or services. It’s essential to conduct a complete check on conflicts and respond with the exact response schema. Everything seems clear so far, and I'm wondering if I should summarize or provide a title. Since no actions are required, maybe I shouldn’t post a comment unless instructed to do so. It seems I should only post findings if there are any, but I’ll complete the check first.

1. browse_code — Inspect the complete current contents and relevant PR changes of apps/mobile/src/features/settings/scheduledTaskDraft.ts and apps/web/src/components/settings/scheduledTasksSettings.logic.ts at the PR head. Determine only whether changed lines create, move, refactor, or consume an Effect service, or violate these conventions: Effect subpath namespace imports; local service namespace boundaries; Context.Service module structure; environment-based dependency acquisition; runtime boundaries; Schema.TaggedError rules; catchTags; explained diagnostic suppressions. Return concise findings with exact file and line, or state none. Do not evaluate unrelated correctness/style.

💭 Clarifying function fields I need to figure out the final details. It seems that function fields might prevent me from making the entire response exactly what I want. Should I clear all the fields for clarity? I see that there's a title limit, and I want to ensure the summary aligns with what I'm aiming for. It’s a bit tricky, but I want to get it just right!

2. modify_pr — All clear ^{Posted via Macroscope — Effect Service Conventions}

3. modify_pr — Correction: the review found no Effect service convention violations in the selected files.