1. browse_code — Review only the changed lines shown for ChatComposer.tsx and ComposerBanner.tsx between merge base ccf220b and head e3de60d for obvious violations of these UI consistency rules: use shared ui primitives rather than raw custom controls; static styling should be Tailwind in owning component rather than CSS/style; composer UI should compose ComposerBanner slots, with shared variants/density in ComposerBanner rather than call-site styling. Do not inspect emitted CSS or trace selector consumers. Return concise findings only if obvious from changed lines.

2. modify_pr — not performed: the agent's request was refused before it ran

3. modify_pr — All clear

💭 Clarifying customer feedback The customer mentioned that comments should reflect individual findings, but I realize that my response included final findings only. It’s clear that posting everything might have been unnecessary. Unfortunately, I can’t delete any reviews, so I’ll have to stick with what’s already been shared. I’ll make sure to take this feedback into account for future responses. It’s a learning moment for me!

4. browse_code — Confirm whether any finding is obvious solely from the changed lines, without broader selector tracing. Answer only yes with finding or no.