1. browse_code — Review only PR changes from merge base 9e68587 to head 12c62c6 in scoped files matching apps//*.ts, packages//.ts, infra/**/.ts excluding **/*.test.ts. Identify whether any changed lines create, move, refactor, or consume an Effect service, especially imports from effect, Context.Service definitions, Layer construction, Effect dependency acquisition, ManagedRuntime/runPromise boundaries, Schema.TaggedError definitions, or catchTag/catchIf usage. Return concise file/line evidence; do not assess .tsx, Kotlin, or tests.

💭 Evaluating tool specifications I'm noticing that the tool might have some mismatches or defaults. My conclusion is that it should have no effect on the overall outcome, but I still need to double-check all fields for accuracy. I can see that we might want to make both the title and summary clear, but it seems the entire UI response isn't exact. I think it's important to define success clearly, too.

2. modify_pr — not performed: the agent's request was refused before it ran

3. modify_pr — All clear

4. modify_pr — not performed: the agent's request was refused before it ran

5. browse_code — The supplied PR diff shows app.config.ts adding Android widget config and publishSubscriptionUsage.android.ts adding dynamic Expo widget imports, unlike your prior description. Regardless of direction, verify strictly whether the changed lines shown in the supplied diff import or use any Effect library APIs or local Effect services. Answer yes/no only with relevant files.

6. modify_pr — not performed: the agent's request was refused before it ran

💭 Evaluating function call details I’m noticing that the complete function namespace isn't listed right now, but the response format function seems to be implicit. I think that implies I might need to call it, even though I'm not fully sure about the specifics yet. It's a bit tricky without all the details, but I can explore that further to understand how to proceed properly. I'll keep this in mind as I move forward!