Skip to content

fix(web): retire the worktree setup row after the first turn

MacroscopeApp / Macroscope - Effect Service Conventions succeeded Sep 16, 2026 in 2m 47s

All clear

All clear

Details

Note

Your check run agent prompt is: .macroscope/check-run-agents/effect-service-conventions.md
More information about how Check Run Agents work can be found in our Help Center.

Reviewed 1 of 4 changed files — those modified since b4a5156 — each against the merge base


🔍 Agent activity — 6 tool calls

💭 Clarifying file logic I see we need to focus on changing the file where the logic remains pure, avoiding any effect on the service. It's essential to ensure that all conflicts in the structured function fields are clear before finalizing everything. The customer wants an exact final response. I think maybe the title and summary could be "All clear," but they need to follow the required schema. I probably don’t need to browse; the differences are clear enough.

1. browse_code — Inspect the complete merge-base-to-head changes in apps/web/src/components/ChatView.logic.ts for PR head 35aced3. Determine whether the changed resolveVisibleWorktreeSetup lines create, move, refactor, or consume an Effect service, or introduce any violation of Effect service conventions (imports, service definition/dependency acquisition/runtime boundaries/errors/change discipline). Return concise findings only.

2. modify_pr — All clear

💭 Analyzing customer feedback I see that the customer didn't get the final response they expected, which is "All clear." Maybe they didn’t ask the PR comment? The reporting suggests we shouldn’t have posted the review body, and it seems we can't undo actions that have already been taken. Since the review can't be deleted, perhaps leaving it as is is the best option? It looks like there's no simple fix here.

3. modify_pr — POST repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{pull_number}/comments — rejected: body must be a single valid JSON object — do not double-encode, concatenate, or wrap the JSON. Correct example: {"body": "comment text"}

4. modify_pr — POST repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{pull_number}/comments

💭 Addressing duplicate issues I think we've added a duplicate issue. I could delete the comment with the specific ID, so that's what I'll do. But it seems like I can’t delete the review body—hmm, that's a bit of a limitation. Still, the review body might be all clear, so that seems like it’s likely expected for the automation post to just comment on the duplicate. Let’s proceed with deleting the comment!

5. modify_pr — DELETE repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/comments/5692311754 — rejected: endpoint "repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/comments/5692311754" is not allowed for DELETE requests. See the tool description for supported endpoints.

6. modify_pr — PATCH repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/comments/5692311754


Agent Credits: 28 credits

Token usage: 30 uncached input · 117,793 cache-read input · 37,523 cache-write input · 1,227 output
Agent Credits may also include non-token charges from external tools such as web research.