Skip to content

fix(devices): preserve literal paths in agent launchers

MacroscopeApp / Macroscope - Effect Service Conventions failed Sep 9, 2026 in 4m 11s

Effect Service Conventions: 2 issues

  • apps/server/src/device/DeviceService.ts:803 captures and replays ambient Effect context, hiding concrete service dependencies.
  • apps/server/src/device/DeviceService.ts:755 still uses a fabricated Error as the cause of CLI unavailability.

Details

Note

Your check run agent prompt is: .macroscope/check-run-agents/effect-service-conventions.md
More information about how Check Run Agents work can be found in our Help Center.


πŸ” Agent activity β€” 16 tool calls

πŸ’­ Inspecting DeviceService changes I need to take a closer look at the current DeviceService to identify any changes and how errors are defined. It's important to check for any unresolved issues or fixes that might have been applied. By understanding these updates, I can ensure everything is functioning as expected and address any potential problems more effectively. So, let's dig into this and clarify what needs attention or adjustment!

1. browse_code β€” apps/server/src/device/DeviceService.ts

2. browse_code β€” apps/server/src/device/DeviceService.ts

3. browse_code β€” Review only changed non-test TypeScript in PR head 2c958c3 versus merge base f7e4ebc for violations of the supplied Effect service conventions: namespace imports/service boundaries, canonical service definition and make/layer, environment dependency acquisition, runtime boundaries, structured Schema.TaggedError handling and cause/message rules, diagnostic directives. Return exact file/line findings only, and assess whether the previously flagged manufactured Error fallback in DeviceService still exists or changed.

4. browse_code β€” apps/server/src/device/DeviceToolchain.ts

5. browse_code β€” apps/server/src/device/AgentDeviceShim.ts

6. browse_code β€” apps/server/src/device/DeviceService.ts

7. browse_code β€” apps/server/src/device/DeviceToolchain.ts

8. modify_pr β€” Submitted review with 1 inline comment

πŸ’­ Organizing findings for report I need to make sure the report is clear and structured. The instructions say that if there are no exact findings, everything is clear, but if there are findings, I need to note any failures and clear violations. Should I mention any unresolved issues alongside the new ones? I wonder if summarizing each finding would be helpful. The user wants a concise actions report, so I'll keep that in mind as I prepare.

9. modify_pr β€” POST repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{pull_number}/comments β€” rejected: body must be a single valid JSON object β€” do not double-encode, concatenate, or wrap the JSON. Correct example: {"body": "comment text"}

10. modify_pr β€” POST repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{pull_number}/comments

11. modify_pr β€” PATCH repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/comments/5593813326

12. modify_pr β€” The previously reported structured-error violation at apps/server/src/device/DeviceService.ts:755 remains unresolved. β€” not performed: the agent's request was refused before it ran

13. modify_pr β€” PATCH repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/comments/5593813326

14. modify_pr β€” PATCH repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/comments/5593813326

15. modify_pr β€” PATCH repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/comments/5593813326

16. modify_pr β€” PATCH repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/comments/5593813326


Agent Credits: 133 credits

Token usage: 60 uncached input Β· 861,448 cache-read input Β· 167,177 cache-write input Β· 3,852 output
Agent Credits may also include non-token charges from external tools such as web research.