-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 234
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GPDB support #1801
Comments
This is a very interesting feature. |
@woblerr , welcome. arenadata#6 This patch is not ready to be in upstream, but it seems to be working. I want to rewrite it. |
The way we have been planning to handle forks is by adding a |
My proposal:
This means that GPDB 6 is based on PostgreSQL 9.4
Are there any objections? Can I start creating a PR? |
I suggest removing the fork-version property, the forkVersion field and the FORK_VERSION macro. Since the pgTablespaceId function will be in interface, the PostgreSQL version and the fork name are enough to output a string of the desired format. In addition, the path in forks may have a different format. |
Closing since there is now a PR under discussion. |
Hi,
PostgreSQL has forks, one of which is GPDB (https://github.com/greenplum-db/gpdb). I would like pgbackrest to work with GPDB too. Are you going to implement support for PostgreSQL forks in pgbackrest? Are there any ideas how to implement? If my colleagues and I prepare a PR to support GPDB, will it be merged?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: