Skip to content

Comments

fix(linter): no-single-promise-in-promise-methods: do not fix Promise.all when chained#9697

Merged
graphite-app[bot] merged 1 commit intomainfrom
03-11-ix_linter_no-single-promise-in-promise-methods_do_not_fix_promise.all_when_chained
Mar 12, 2025
Merged

fix(linter): no-single-promise-in-promise-methods: do not fix Promise.all when chained#9697
graphite-app[bot] merged 1 commit intomainfrom
03-11-ix_linter_no-single-promise-in-promise-methods_do_not_fix_promise.all_when_chained

Conversation

@camchenry
Copy link
Member

@camchenry camchenry commented Mar 12, 2025

Copy link
Member Author


How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add either label to this PR to merge it via the merge queue:

  • 0-merge - adds this PR to the back of the merge queue
  • hotfix - for urgent hot fixes, skip the queue and merge this PR next

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the A-linter Area - Linter label Mar 12, 2025
@camchenry camchenry changed the title ix(linter): no-single-promise-in-promise-methods: do not fix Promise.all when chained fix(linter): no-single-promise-in-promise-methods: do not fix Promise.all when chained Mar 12, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the C-bug Category - Bug label Mar 12, 2025
@camchenry camchenry marked this pull request as ready for review March 12, 2025 03:59
@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Mar 12, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #9697 will not alter performance

Comparing 03-11-ix_linter_no-single-promise-in-promise-methods_do_not_fix_promise.all_when_chained (6c0978b) with main (3429898)

Summary

✅ 33 untouched benchmarks

@camchenry camchenry force-pushed the 03-11-ix_linter_no-single-promise-in-promise-methods_do_not_fix_promise.all_when_chained branch from 9c4a058 to a10f952 Compare March 12, 2025 04:21
@shulaoda shulaoda added the 0-merge Merge with Graphite Merge Queue label Mar 12, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

shulaoda commented Mar 12, 2025

Merge activity

  • Mar 12, 7:02 AM EDT: The merge label '0-merge' was detected. This PR will be added to the Graphite merge queue once it meets the requirements.
  • Mar 12, 7:02 AM EDT: A user added this pull request to the Graphite merge queue.
  • Mar 12, 7:07 AM EDT: A user merged this pull request with the Graphite merge queue.

@graphite-app graphite-app bot force-pushed the 03-11-ix_linter_no-single-promise-in-promise-methods_do_not_fix_promise.all_when_chained branch from a10f952 to 6c0978b Compare March 12, 2025 11:02
@graphite-app graphite-app bot merged commit 6c0978b into main Mar 12, 2025
25 checks passed
@graphite-app graphite-app bot deleted the 03-11-ix_linter_no-single-promise-in-promise-methods_do_not_fix_promise.all_when_chained branch March 12, 2025 11:07
@graphite-app graphite-app bot removed the 0-merge Merge with Graphite Merge Queue label Mar 12, 2025
Boshen added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2025
## [0.15.15] - 2025-03-12

### Features

- 2ddad59 linter: Add unicorn/require-post-message-target-origin rule
(#9684) (yefan)
- 474a57b linter: A new multi-file analysis runtime (#9383) (branchseer)

### Bug Fixes

- 6c0978b linter: No-single-promise-in-promise-methods: do not fix
Promise.all when chained (#9697) (camchenry)
- ab594f1 linter: Turn oxc/no-redundant-constructor-init into
typescript/no-unnecessary-parameter-property-assignment (#9618) (Uli)
- 91c009a linter: Add missing fail cases in
`eslint-no-array-constructor` (#9659) (therewillbecode)
- 2810e5b linter: Add missing fail cases in eslint/no-self-compare
(#9693) (therewillbecode)

### Refactor

- b9ab60b linter: Remove if let nesting from `bad-min-max-function`
(#9722) (therewillbecode)
- 90b0227 linter: Remove if let nesting from
`eslint-operator-assignment` (#9721) (therewillbecode)
- 5ef578e linter: Improve `jest/no-alias-methods` (#9694)
(therewillbecode)

Co-authored-by: Boshen <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A-linter Area - Linter C-bug Category - Bug

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

linter: incorrect fix for no-single-promise-in-promise-methods

3 participants