Skip to content

Comments

refactor(linter): Use parsed patterns for unicorn/prefer-string-replace-all rule#5943

Merged
graphite-app[bot] merged 1 commit intomainfrom
linter/use-parsed-pattern-string-replace-all
Sep 21, 2024
Merged

refactor(linter): Use parsed patterns for unicorn/prefer-string-replace-all rule#5943
graphite-app[bot] merged 1 commit intomainfrom
linter/use-parsed-pattern-string-replace-all

Conversation

@camchenry
Copy link
Member

Replaces the is_simple_string method with a more robust check against the parsed terms from the regular expression.

@graphite-app
Copy link
Contributor

graphite-app bot commented Sep 21, 2024

Your org has enabled the Graphite merge queue for merging into main

Add the label “0-merge” to the PR and Graphite will automatically add it to the merge queue when it’s ready to merge. Or use the label “hotfix” to add to the merge queue as a hot fix.

You must have a Graphite account and log in to Graphite in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the A-linter Area - Linter label Sep 21, 2024
@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Sep 21, 2024

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #5943 will not alter performance

Comparing linter/use-parsed-pattern-string-replace-all (3273b64) with main (c477424)

Summary

✅ 29 untouched benchmarks

@camchenry camchenry force-pushed the linter/use-parsed-pattern-string-replace-all branch from ca40c94 to ce39776 Compare September 21, 2024 15:01
Copy link
Member Author

camchenry commented Sep 21, 2024

@graphite-app
Copy link
Contributor

graphite-app bot commented Sep 21, 2024

Merge activity

  • Sep 21, 11:02 AM EDT: The merge label '0-merge' was detected. This PR will be added to the Graphite merge queue once it meets the requirements.
  • Sep 21, 11:05 AM EDT: camchenry added this pull request to the Graphite merge queue.
  • Sep 21, 11:05 AM EDT: The Graphite merge queue couldn't merge this PR because it failed for an unknown reason.
  • Sep 21, 11:06 AM EDT: The merge label '0-merge' was detected. This PR will be added to the Graphite merge queue once it meets the requirements.
  • Sep 21, 11:06 AM EDT: camchenry added this pull request to the Graphite merge queue.
  • Sep 21, 11:06 AM EDT: The Graphite merge queue couldn't merge this PR because it failed for an unknown reason.
  • Sep 21, 2:02 PM EDT: The merge label '0-merge' was detected. This PR will be added to the Graphite merge queue once it meets the requirements.
  • Sep 21, 2:02 PM EDT: camc314 added this pull request to the Graphite merge queue.
  • Sep 21, 2:06 PM EDT: camc314 merged this pull request with the Graphite merge queue.

@graphite-app graphite-app bot removed the 0-merge Merge with Graphite Merge Queue label Sep 21, 2024
@camchenry camchenry added the 0-merge Merge with Graphite Merge Queue label Sep 21, 2024
@graphite-app graphite-app bot removed the 0-merge Merge with Graphite Merge Queue label Sep 21, 2024
@camchenry
Copy link
Member Author

@Boshen do you know why this isn't mergeable? I'm not too experienced with Graphite, could we just merge this with GitHub?

@camc314 camc314 added the 0-merge Merge with Graphite Merge Queue label Sep 21, 2024
…ace-all` rule (#5943)

- part of #5416

Replaces the `is_simple_string` method with a more robust check against the parsed terms from the regular expression.
@camc314 camc314 force-pushed the linter/use-parsed-pattern-string-replace-all branch from ce39776 to 3273b64 Compare September 21, 2024 18:03
@graphite-app graphite-app bot merged commit 3273b64 into main Sep 21, 2024
@graphite-app graphite-app bot deleted the linter/use-parsed-pattern-string-replace-all branch September 21, 2024 18:06
@camc314
Copy link
Contributor

camc314 commented Sep 21, 2024

@ Boshen do you know why this isn't mergeable? I'm not too experienced with Graphite, could we just merge this with GitHub?

probs bug in graphite or an error in the GH api "couldn't merge this PR because it failed for an unknown reason."
i just added the merge lable again and it was successful

@oxc-bot oxc-bot mentioned this pull request Sep 23, 2024
Boshen added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 23, 2024
## [0.9.7] - 2024-09-23

### Features

- d24985e linter: Add `oxc-security/api-keys` (#5906) (DonIsaac)
- f9b44c5 linter: Add unicode sets support to `no-useless-escape` rule
(#5974) (camchenry)
- 0f19848 linter: Implement `no-unexpected-multiline` rule (#5911)
(camchenry)
- 16fe383 linter: Implement `no-extend-native` rule (#5867) (Cam
McHenry)

### Bug Fixes

- eed9ac7 linter: Include actual span size in `no-regex-spaces`
diagnostic (#5957) (camchenry)
- 40c89c2 linter: Move `promise/avoid-new` to style category (#5961)
(DonIsaac)

### Performance

- 608d637 linter: Use `aho-corasick` instead of `regex` for string
matching in `jsx-a11y/img-redundant-alt` (#5892) (camchenry)
- 3148d4b linter: Check file path after checking node kind for
`nextjs/no-head-element` (#5868) (Cam McHenry)

### Refactor

- 0a5a4a9 linter: Use parsed patterns for `unicorn/no-hex-escape`
(#5985) (camchenry)
- 2cf2edd linter: Use parsed patterns in `no-empty-character-class` rule
(#5980) (camchenry)
- a9a8e2a linter: Use regex parser in `eslint/no-regex-spaces` (#5952)
(camchenry)
- 05f592b linter: Use parsed patterns in
`unicorn/prefer-string-starts-ends-with` (#5949) (camchenry)
- 3273b64 linter: Use parsed patterns for
`unicorn/prefer-string-replace-all` rule (#5943) (camchenry)
- ba7b01f linter: Add `LinterBuilder` (#5714) (DonIsaac)
- db4f16a semantic: Call `with_trivias` before `build_with_jsdoc`
(#5875) (Boshen)
- 3d13c6d semantic: Impl `IntoIterator` for `&AstNodes` (#5873)
(DonIsaac)

### Testing

- b681c9a linter: Import test cases for `no-empty-character-class`
(#5981) (camchenry)
- 767602b linter: Add regression test for #5227 (#5975) (camchenry)

---------

Co-authored-by: Boshen <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: autofix-ci[bot] <114827586+autofix-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

0-merge Merge with Graphite Merge Queue A-linter Area - Linter

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants