Skip to content

fix(linter/no-shadow): align initializer shadow handling with typescript-eslint#19462

Merged
graphite-app[bot] merged 1 commit intomainfrom
c/02-16-fix_linter_no-shadow_align_initializer_shadow_handling_with_typescript-eslint
Feb 17, 2026
Merged

fix(linter/no-shadow): align initializer shadow handling with typescript-eslint#19462
graphite-app[bot] merged 1 commit intomainfrom
c/02-16-fix_linter_no-shadow_align_initializer_shadow_handling_with_typescript-eslint

Conversation

@camc314
Copy link
Contributor

@camc314 camc314 commented Feb 16, 2026

fixes #19461

Copy link
Contributor Author

camc314 commented Feb 16, 2026


How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add either label to this PR to merge it via the merge queue:

  • 0-merge - adds this PR to the back of the merge queue
  • hotfix - for urgent hot fixes, skip the queue and merge this PR next

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@github-actions github-actions bot added A-linter Area - Linter C-bug Category - Bug labels Feb 16, 2026
@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Feb 16, 2026

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 47 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 3 skipped benchmarks1


Comparing c/02-16-fix_linter_no-shadow_align_initializer_shadow_handling_with_typescript-eslint (6e6dd36) with main (e814049)

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 3 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

@camc314 camc314 force-pushed the c/02-16-fix_linter_no-shadow_align_initializer_shadow_handling_with_typescript-eslint branch from 6e6dd36 to 71bb08b Compare February 17, 2026 12:22
@camc314 camc314 marked this pull request as ready for review February 17, 2026 12:23
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings February 17, 2026 12:23
@camc314 camc314 self-assigned this Feb 17, 2026
@camc314 camc314 force-pushed the c/02-16-fix_linter_no-shadow_align_initializer_shadow_handling_with_typescript-eslint branch from 71bb08b to 2ac31a9 Compare February 17, 2026 12:23
@camc314 camc314 added the 0-merge Merge with Graphite Merge Queue label Feb 17, 2026
Copy link
Contributor Author

camc314 commented Feb 17, 2026

Merge activity

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Aligns eslint/no-shadow’s handling of named function/class expressions used in initializers with typescript-eslint behavior (fixing the false-positive reported in #19461 for memo(function FooBarComponent() {}) patterns).

Changes:

  • Adjust rule execution/ignore logic so initializer-related shadowing is handled consistently with typescript-eslint.
  • Update snapshots to reflect removed diagnostics for the affected initializer cases.
  • Add a TSX regression test for the React memo(function ...) pattern and disable a set of ESLint-suite fail cases that no longer apply.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.

File Description
crates/oxc_linter/src/rules/eslint/no_shadow/mod.rs Updates the shadow-detection/ignore flow and refines initializer exception handling.
crates/oxc_linter/src/rules/eslint/no_shadow/tests.rs Disables several fail cases and adds a TSX regression test for the reported scenario.
crates/oxc_linter/src/snapshots/eslint_no_shadow.snap Removes diagnostics that should no longer be emitted after the behavior change.

@camc314 camc314 force-pushed the c/02-16-fix_linter_no-shadow_align_initializer_shadow_handling_with_typescript-eslint branch from 2ac31a9 to b000ae2 Compare February 17, 2026 12:34
@graphite-app graphite-app bot force-pushed the c/02-16-fix_linter_no-shadow_align_initializer_shadow_handling_with_typescript-eslint branch from b000ae2 to a9bb604 Compare February 17, 2026 12:39
@graphite-app graphite-app bot merged commit a9bb604 into main Feb 17, 2026
21 checks passed
@graphite-app graphite-app bot deleted the c/02-16-fix_linter_no-shadow_align_initializer_shadow_handling_with_typescript-eslint branch February 17, 2026 12:45
@graphite-app graphite-app bot removed the 0-merge Merge with Graphite Merge Queue label Feb 17, 2026
camc314 added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 19, 2026
# Oxlint
### 💥 BREAKING CHANGES

- 4315594 oxlint: [**BREAKING**] Deprecate `"always"` and `"as-needed"`
options of the radix rule (#19408) (Sysix)
- d4c7af3 linter: [**BREAKING**] Remove
`allowRuleToRunWithoutStrictNullChecksIKnowWhatIAmDoing` option (#19451)
(camc314)

### 🚀 Features

- 82ca5c3 linter: Add typescript/dot-notation rule (#19442) (camc314)
- 6db0811 linter: Implement
eslint-plugin-vitest/no-importing-vitest-globals (#18694) (Said
Atrahouch)
- c7fe8ae linter: Implement eslint-plugin-vitest/prefer-import-in-mock
(#17966) (Said Atrahouch)
- 0abb39a linter: Implement
eslint-vitest-jest-plugin/prefer-mock-return-shorthand (#18002) (Said
Atrahouch)
- 2b95537 linter: Implement `n/no-path-concat` rule (#19502) (Mikhail
Baev)
- 735d0e4 linter: Implement typescript/no-useless-default-assignment
(#19488) (camc314)
- 31c3a93 linter: Add typescript/no-unnecessary-type-parameters rule
(#19450) (camc314)
- c948090 linter: Add typescript/consistent-return rule (#19449)
(camc314)
- 9f87df0 linter: Add typescript/prefer-string-starts-ends-with rule
(#19448) (camc314)
- 04536be linter: Add typescript/prefer-regexp-exec rule (#19447)
(camc314)
- 56a7feb linter: Add typescript/prefer-readonly rule (#19446) (camc314)
- a1cea63 linter: Add typescript/no-unnecessary-qualifier rule (#19445)
(camc314)
- e3144d2 linter: Add typescript/prefer-find rule (#19444) (camc314)
- 13c7408 linter: Add typescript/prefer-readonly-parameter-types rule
(#19443) (camc314)
- 9b17d44 linter: Add typescript/strict-void-return rule (#19441)
(camc314)
- ed821b4 linter: Add typescript/consistent-type-exports rule (#19440)
(camc314)

### 🐛 Bug Fixes

- daad7bc linter/array-callback-return: Check `allowVoid` option
(#19506) (Said Atrahouch)
- 638cf94 linter: Add help text to eslint rule diagnostics (#19508)
(Kyle Tse)
- 79fc6d7 linter: Move no-use-before-define to eslint plugin (#19438)
(camc314)
- c832a9f linter: Add `onScrollEnd` and `onScrollEndCapture` to
`react/no-unknown-property`. (#19536) (connorshea)
- 999a0db linter: Add help text to `symbol-description` diagnostics
(#19538) (Anthony Amaro)
- f064482 linter: Add help text to eslint rule diagnostics (#19539)
(Anthony Amaro)
- fd11073 linter/react/no-unknown-property: Add missing `fetchPriority`
prop (#19525) (João Pedro Schmitz)
- a9bb604 linter/no-shadow: Align initializer shadow handling with
typescript-eslint (#19462) (camc314)
- 32e6eb9 linter: Handle typed arrays/array buffers in `prefer-spread`
rule. (#19478) (connorshea)
- e309f84 linter: Handle additional cases in
`typescript/consistent-generic-constructors` rule. (#19477) (connorshea)
- 71db91a linter/array-callback-return: Check `fromAsync`, update test
cases (#19483) (Said Atrahouch)
- 2a12d74 linter: Handle optional chaining in
`no-array-method-this-argument` rule. (#19476) (connorshea)
- f65310b linter: Handle optional chaining in
`prefer-object-from-entries` rule. (#19475) (connorshea)
- 840acf4 linter: Handle optional chain in
`no-unnecessary-array-flat-depth` rule. (#19471) (connorshea)
- 85a19e9 linter: Skip string literal imports in `consistent-assert`
rule. (#19474) (connorshea)

### ⚡ Performance

- 6155ac4 linter/constructor-super: Use node_id over nodes loop (#19489)
(camc314)
- a02496d linter/consistent-index-object-style: Resolve circular type
refs semantically (#19490) (camc314)
# Oxfmt
### 🚀 Features

- 652c346 oxfmt/lsp: Support `untitled://` schema (#19287) (Sysix)

### 🐛 Bug Fixes

- 6c61b70 oxfmt: Fix outdated `sortImports.groups` doc comments (#19513)
(leaysgur)

Co-authored-by: camc314 <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A-linter Area - Linter C-bug Category - Bug

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

linter: Difference in eslint/no-shadow rule behavior vs original ts-eslint rule

2 participants

Comments