Skip to content

perf(flake): speed up rebuild by using naersk#76

Merged
orhun merged 1 commit intoorhun:mainfrom
ch4og:test
Oct 9, 2024
Merged

perf(flake): speed up rebuild by using naersk#76
orhun merged 1 commit intoorhun:mainfrom
ch4og:test

Conversation

@ch4og
Copy link
Contributor

@ch4og ch4og commented Oct 9, 2024

Description of change

Build using naersk which is much faster on rebuilds

How has this been tested? (if applicable)

When building using #75 time decreases from 3m2s to 1m40s
(https://github.com/ch4og/binsider/actions/runs/11246715759/job/31268990666)

@ch4og ch4og requested a review from orhun as a code owner October 9, 2024 02:00
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 9, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 3.33%. Comparing base (c11c887) to head (16567a2).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##            main     #76   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage   3.33%   3.33%           
=====================================
  Files         19      19           
  Lines       2407    2407           
=====================================
  Hits          80      80           
  Misses      2327    2327           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@ch4og ch4og changed the title feat(flake): speed up rebuild by using naersk perf(flake): speed up rebuild by using naersk Oct 9, 2024
Copy link
Owner

@orhun orhun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@orhun orhun merged commit ffb35ea into orhun:main Oct 9, 2024
@ch4og ch4og deleted the test branch October 9, 2024 17:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants