Add the acceptance of cwes field to the GrypeEntry#905
Merged
jormundur00 merged 1 commit intomasterfrom Dec 19, 2025
Merged
Conversation
matneu
reviewed
Dec 19, 2025
| } | ||
|
|
||
| class Cwe { | ||
| public String cve; |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Does that map the CWE (Common Weakness Enumerator, ~= vulnerability type) to an individual CVE (actual vulnaerability) in the json?
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, exactly. An example of an Cwe object looks like the following: CWE(cve=CVE-2022-2879, cwe=CWE-770, type=Primary).
We currently don't use this specific field in our analysis, but must register (and ignore) it so our parsing of the Grype output doesn't fail.
matneu
approved these changes
Dec 19, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR do?
Currently, GrypeTask fails for some docker images due to a missing
cwesfield. In this PR, we add the missing field to theGrypeEntryclass, so it is properly ignored.Fixes: #904