Skip to content

license: removes copyright year and uses SPDX ID#220

Merged
codefromthecrypt merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
SPDX
Apr 14, 2024
Merged

license: removes copyright year and uses SPDX ID#220
codefromthecrypt merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
SPDX

Conversation

@codefromthecrypt
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

As a small project, we have to conserve resources and not sign up for work that isn't required. I've recently realized many commercial and/or CNCF projects both use SPDX IDs and also don't bother with copyright year. If their legal team is ok with this, surely a volunteer team without access to one, should be, too! Doing so accomplishes the following:

  • significantly increases readability of files, particularly small ones
  • removes beginning of year maintenance, which cause a lot of FUD last year. IIRC some deployment failed and hours were spent in spite of docs.
  • eliminates the need to do a full source check out, just to satisfy the license plugin. This means we can use actions/checkout defaults.

Same as openzipkin/zipkin-reporter-java#257

As a small project, we have to conserve resources and not sign up for work that isn't required. I've recently realized many commercial and/or CNCF projects both use SPDX IDs and also don't bother with copyright year. If their legal team is ok with this, surely a volunteer team without access to one, should be, too! Doing so accomplishes the following:

* significantly increases readability of files, particularly small ones
* removes beginning of year maintenance, which cause a lot of FUD last year. IIRC some deployment failed and hours were spent in spite of docs.
* eliminates the need to do a full source check out, just to satisfy the license plugin. This means we can use actions/checkout defaults.

Same as openzipkin/zipkin-reporter-java#257

Signed-off-by: Adrian Cole <[email protected]>
@codefromthecrypt codefromthecrypt merged commit 61b5f7e into master Apr 14, 2024
@codefromthecrypt codefromthecrypt deleted the SPDX branch April 14, 2024 19:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants