[GNA] Added test ScaleShift and fixed power layer with non zero shift#774
Conversation
dd97a79 to
b64192d
Compare
|
@dorloff , @esmirno, @pavel-rodionov check please. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
From the IE perspective, it is actually a single layer graph, but in fact, we strive to keep single layer tests with only one ngraph op. Let's name them "single operation" from the opset specification perspective.
Since you are implementing chain of operation (despite of them will be folded to one ScaleShift layer in IE representation) I request to move such test shared subgraph_tests
76f1f6b to
81510c0
Compare
a39eb1d to
d353c29
Compare
|
was testAssert passed validation? |
|
@esmirno, Yes, testAssert passed. |
|
@admitriev-gna cool, so lets use naming like quantizedWeights, weights, or powerWeights since it is not an identity as i pointed previously. or better quantizedScale, and quantizedOffset |
d353c29 to
116394b
Compare
|
should be only 2 comits not 13 please figure out - probably originate branch should be rebased |
116394b to
5554627
Compare
5554627 to
b51acc2
Compare
added tests [GNA] Added test ScaleShift and fixed power layer with non zero shift
b51acc2 to
9c073e8
Compare
…openvinotoolkit#774) * [GNA] Added test ScaleShift and fixed power layer with non zero shift
Added test ScaleShift and fixed power layer with non zero shift