Skip to content

Comments

Fix reversed meaning of error codes#9529

Closed
mukrop wants to merge 1 commit intoopenssl:masterfrom
mukrop:master
Closed

Fix reversed meaning of error codes#9529
mukrop wants to merge 1 commit intoopenssl:masterfrom
mukrop:master

Conversation

@mukrop
Copy link
Contributor

@mukrop mukrop commented Aug 5, 2019

The meaning of the X509_V_ERR_UNABLE_TO_GET_ISSUER_CERT_LOCALLY and X509_V_ERR_UNABLE_TO_GET_ISSUER_CERT error codes were still reversed in the X509_STORE_CTX_get_error function documentation.
This used to be the problem also in the verify application documentation, but was fixed on 2010-02-23 in 7d3d178.

Although the change may be trivial, I'll send the ICLA as I expect to be doing multiple such smaller documentation-related pull requests in the near future.

@richsalz: This is a bit from newer research on the usability of X509-capable libraries here at CRoCS, Masaryk University, you reviewed my previous suggestion in #4548.

The meaning of the X509_V_ERR_UNABLE_TO_GET_ISSUER_CERT_LOCALLY and X509_V_ERR_UNABLE_TO_GET_ISSUER_CERT error codes were still reversed in the X509_STORE_CTX_get_error function documentation.
This used to be the problem also in the verify application documentation, but was fixed on 2010-02-23 in 7d3d178.
@openssl-machine openssl-machine added the hold: cla required The contributor needs to submit a license agreement label Aug 5, 2019
@richsalz
Copy link
Contributor

richsalz commented Aug 5, 2019

@mukrop it's great that you're still involved and going to help fix doc problems!

@mukrop
Copy link
Contributor Author

mukrop commented Aug 6, 2019

I got acknowledgment that my CLA was received. I'm not sure now -- will the CLA check run again automatically?

@mattcaswell
Copy link
Member

Close/reopen to kick CLA bot

@mattcaswell mattcaswell closed this Aug 6, 2019
@mattcaswell mattcaswell reopened this Aug 6, 2019
@openssl-machine openssl-machine removed the hold: cla required The contributor needs to submit a license agreement label Aug 6, 2019
@mattcaswell mattcaswell added branch: 1.1.1 Applies to OpenSSL_1_1_1-stable branch (EOL) branch: master Applies to master branch labels Aug 6, 2019
@mattcaswell mattcaswell added the approval: review pending This pull request needs review by a committer label Aug 6, 2019
@slontis slontis added approval: done This pull request has the required number of approvals and removed approval: review pending This pull request needs review by a committer labels Aug 7, 2019
levitte pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 8, 2019
The meaning of the X509_V_ERR_UNABLE_TO_GET_ISSUER_CERT_LOCALLY and X509_V_ERR_UNABLE_TO_GET_ISSUER_CERT error codes were still reversed in the X509_STORE_CTX_get_error function documentation.
This used to be the problem also in the verify application documentation, but was fixed on 2010-02-23 in 7d3d178.

Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <[email protected]>
(Merged from #9529)

(cherry picked from commit 6d5aa88)
@mattcaswell
Copy link
Member

Pushed to master and 1.1.1. Thanks.

@mattcaswell mattcaswell closed this Aug 8, 2019
levitte pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 8, 2019
The meaning of the X509_V_ERR_UNABLE_TO_GET_ISSUER_CERT_LOCALLY and X509_V_ERR_UNABLE_TO_GET_ISSUER_CERT error codes were still reversed in the X509_STORE_CTX_get_error function documentation.
This used to be the problem also in the verify application documentation, but was fixed on 2010-02-23 in 7d3d178.

Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <[email protected]>
(Merged from #9529)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approval: done This pull request has the required number of approvals branch: master Applies to master branch branch: 1.1.1 Applies to OpenSSL_1_1_1-stable branch (EOL)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants