-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Clarify Oracle's license #3663
Clarify Oracle's license #3663
Conversation
I'll pass on the changed version to legal and see what they think. |
2773ab7
to
eda6c09
Compare
So my understanding is that we have the needed legal papers from Oracle to put it either under the existing OpenSSL license or the apache2 license. If legal has a problem with putting it like that, we could also just repeat the license text. In either case, I think the current situation seems to indicate that there is no license, while we clearly do have one. |
Yes. |
I've heard back from legal, the location isn't an issue. The only thing raised was the formatting of the copyright note itself. The approved format is:
Where the first year is the first release and the second is the year of the most recent revision. In this case it differs from what I added by including a single additional comma. The
I.e. adding a comma after the With this proviso, I approve. |
I've taken the liberty of making the comma change in #3684. I've also addressed this in all files. |
I forget to mention, this PR can be closed since the changes are in the other PR. |
Closing as this is covered in #3684 now |
This imports the following changes from OpenSSL: * openssl/openssl@aa8f3d7 * openssl/openssl@5aba2b6 * openssl/openssl@c80149d See the following links for some related discussion in OpenSSL's repository: * openssl/openssl#3663 * openssl/openssl#3684 * openssl/openssl#3585 (comment) * openssl/openssl#3685 The copyright_summary script may be used to compare this CL. Note there is one change to ecdsa_test.cc to align with OpenSSL. See go/openssl-copyright-consolidation-comparison (internal-only). Bug: 364634028 Change-Id: I987c4e145d2ccd0c32bbf9e7bb2cc69e89019d35 Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/74712 Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <[email protected]> Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <[email protected]>
This imports the following changes from OpenSSL: * openssl/openssl@aa8f3d7 * openssl/openssl@5aba2b6 * openssl/openssl@c80149d See the following links for some related discussion in OpenSSL's repository: * openssl/openssl#3663 * openssl/openssl#3684 * openssl/openssl#3585 (comment) * openssl/openssl#3685 The copyright_summary script may be used to compare this CL. Note there is one change to ecdsa_test.cc to align with OpenSSL. See go/openssl-copyright-consolidation-comparison (internal-only). Bug: 364634028 Change-Id: I987c4e145d2ccd0c32bbf9e7bb2cc69e89019d35 Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/74712 Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <[email protected]> Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <[email protected]>
@paulidale: Do you agree that this clarifies the situation and that we can merge this?