Skip to content

Comments

util/ and .ctags.d/: remove remaining references to deleted util/check-format.pl#29655

Closed
DDvO wants to merge 1 commit intoopenssl:masterfrom
siemens:cleanup_check-format.pl
Closed

util/ and .ctags.d/: remove remaining references to deleted util/check-format.pl#29655
DDvO wants to merge 1 commit intoopenssl:masterfrom
siemens:cleanup_check-format.pl

Conversation

@DDvO
Copy link
Contributor

@DDvO DDvO commented Jan 16, 2026

This is a follow-up on #29594, where I wrote the following but my comment got neglected there:

Yeah, #29282 was not really complete w.r.t. removal of check-format.pl.

Since util/check-format.pl was removed, so should also be its internal tests util/check-format-test-{positives,negatives}.c and a reference to check-format-test-positives.c in .ctags.d/exclude.ctags

@DDvO DDvO added branch: master Applies to master branch approval: review pending This pull request needs review by a committer triaged: cleanup The issue/pr deals with cleanup of comments/docs not altering code significantly tests: exempted The PR is exempt from requirements for testing labels Jan 16, 2026
@DDvO DDvO changed the title util/ and .ctags.d/: remove remaining references to deleted util/check-format.pl util/ and .ctags.d/: remove remaining references to deleted util/check-format.pl Jan 16, 2026
@t8m t8m added triaged: bug The issue/pr is/fixes a bug branch: 3.0 Applies to openssl-3.0 branch branch: 3.3 Applies to openssl-3.3 branch: 3.4 Applies to openssl-3.4 branch: 3.5 Applies to openssl-3.5 branch: 3.6 Applies to openssl-3.6 and removed triaged: cleanup The issue/pr deals with cleanup of comments/docs not altering code significantly labels Jan 16, 2026
@t8m
Copy link
Member

t8m commented Jan 16, 2026

IMO this should be backported to all active branches as those leftovers are just confusing and should have been removed with the other PR already.

@esyr esyr added approval: done This pull request has the required number of approvals and removed approval: review pending This pull request needs review by a committer labels Jan 16, 2026
@openssl-machine openssl-machine added approval: ready to merge The 24 hour grace period has passed, ready to merge and removed approval: done This pull request has the required number of approvals labels Jan 17, 2026
@openssl-machine
Copy link
Collaborator

This pull request is ready to merge

openssl-machine pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 19, 2026
…k-format.pl

Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Eugene Syromiatnikov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <[email protected]>
(Merged from #29655)
openssl-machine pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 19, 2026
…k-format.pl

Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Eugene Syromiatnikov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <[email protected]>
(Merged from #29655)

(cherry picked from commit 85bc702)
openssl-machine pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 19, 2026
…k-format.pl

Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Eugene Syromiatnikov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <[email protected]>
(Merged from #29655)

(cherry picked from commit 85bc702)
openssl-machine pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 19, 2026
…k-format.pl

Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Eugene Syromiatnikov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <[email protected]>
(Merged from #29655)

(cherry picked from commit 85bc702)
openssl-machine pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 19, 2026
…k-format.pl

Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Eugene Syromiatnikov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <[email protected]>
(Merged from #29655)

(cherry picked from commit 85bc702)
openssl-machine pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 19, 2026
…k-format.pl

Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Eugene Syromiatnikov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <[email protected]>
(Merged from #29655)

(cherry picked from commit 85bc702)
@DDvO
Copy link
Contributor Author

DDvO commented Jan 19, 2026

Merged to the changes to the active branches.
Was about to close this, but see below.

@DDvO
Copy link
Contributor Author

DDvO commented Jan 19, 2026

@quarckster et al., I just noticed further incompleteness of #29282:

  • an entry is missing in NEWS.md regarding the switch to clang-format.
  • also CONTRIBUTING.md still needs to be updated.

esyr pushed a commit to esyr/openssl that referenced this pull request Jan 19, 2026
…k-format.pl

Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Eugene Syromiatnikov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <[email protected]>
(Merged from openssl#29655)
@t8m
Copy link
Member

t8m commented Jan 20, 2026

Closing as any other changes need a new PR.

@t8m t8m closed this Jan 20, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approval: ready to merge The 24 hour grace period has passed, ready to merge branch: master Applies to master branch branch: 3.0 Applies to openssl-3.0 branch branch: 3.3 Applies to openssl-3.3 branch: 3.4 Applies to openssl-3.4 branch: 3.5 Applies to openssl-3.5 branch: 3.6 Applies to openssl-3.6 tests: exempted The PR is exempt from requirements for testing triaged: bug The issue/pr is/fixes a bug

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants