Ensure our buffer allocation allows for the Explicit IV (3.1/3.0)#20086
Closed
mattcaswell wants to merge 6 commits intoopenssl:openssl-3.1from
Closed
Ensure our buffer allocation allows for the Explicit IV (3.1/3.0)#20086mattcaswell wants to merge 6 commits intoopenssl:openssl-3.1from
mattcaswell wants to merge 6 commits intoopenssl:openssl-3.1from
Conversation
Test that sending large app data records works correctly.
Some ciphers/protocol versions have an explicit IV. We need to make sure we have sufficient room for it in the underlying buffer.
2 tasks
Member
|
CI is relevant |
paulidale
previously approved these changes
Jan 20, 2023
Member
|
The minimal CI failures still need to be fixed. |
t8m
approved these changes
Jan 20, 2023
paulidale
approved these changes
Jan 22, 2023
Collaborator
|
This pull request is ready to merge |
Contributor
|
Merged to 3.0 and 3.1. |
openssl-machine
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 24, 2023
Test that sending large app data records works correctly. Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <[email protected]> (Merged from #20086)
openssl-machine
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 24, 2023
Some ciphers/protocol versions have an explicit IV. We need to make sure we have sufficient room for it in the underlying buffer. Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <[email protected]> (Merged from #20086)
openssl-machine
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 24, 2023
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <[email protected]> (Merged from #20086)
openssl-machine
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 24, 2023
Test that sending large app data records works correctly. Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <[email protected]> (Merged from #20086) (cherry picked from commit 5e73bf0)
openssl-machine
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 24, 2023
Some ciphers/protocol versions have an explicit IV. We need to make sure we have sufficient room for it in the underlying buffer. Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <[email protected]> (Merged from #20086) (cherry picked from commit 3be93f1)
openssl-machine
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 24, 2023
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <[email protected]> (Merged from #20086) (cherry picked from commit d36a9d6)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Some ciphers/protocol versions have an explicit IV. We need to make sure we
have sufficient room for it in the underlying buffer.
This is a backport of #20085.
This fixes a regression introduced by #19517 and should be merged before any 3.0.8 is released.