Skip to content

Comments

Detect arm64-*-*bsd and enable assembly optimizations#17084

Closed
allanjude wants to merge 1 commit intoopenssl:masterfrom
allanjude:freebsd_aarch_build
Closed

Detect arm64-*-*bsd and enable assembly optimizations#17084
allanjude wants to merge 1 commit intoopenssl:masterfrom
allanjude:freebsd_aarch_build

Conversation

@allanjude
Copy link
Contributor

CLA: trivial

freebsd-git pushed a commit to freebsd/freebsd-ports that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2021
@t8m t8m added branch: master Applies to master branch cla: trivial One of the commits is marked as 'CLA: trivial' triaged: feature The issue/pr requests/adds a feature labels Nov 22, 2021
@t8m
Copy link
Member

t8m commented Nov 22, 2021

I am not sure this is acceptable with CLA: trivial. Would you please consider signing a regular CLA? https://www.openssl.org/policies/cla.html

Copy link
Contributor

@paulidale paulidale left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Border line on the trivial. A CLA is the best way forwards.
Otherwise it looks good.

@paulidale paulidale added the approval: review pending This pull request needs review by a committer label Nov 24, 2021
@openssl-machine openssl-machine added the hold: cla required The contributor needs to submit a license agreement label Nov 24, 2021
@allanjude
Copy link
Contributor Author

I've signed an ICLA

@paulidale paulidale closed this Nov 25, 2021
@paulidale paulidale reopened this Nov 25, 2021
@openssl-machine openssl-machine removed the hold: cla required The contributor needs to submit a license agreement label Nov 25, 2021
@paulidale
Copy link
Contributor

CLA is good.

@t8m t8m added approval: done This pull request has the required number of approvals and removed approval: review pending This pull request needs review by a committer cla: trivial One of the commits is marked as 'CLA: trivial' labels Nov 25, 2021
ocochard pushed a commit to ocochard/freebsd-ports that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2021
@paulidale
Copy link
Contributor

Merged to master, thanks for the contribution.

@paulidale paulidale closed this Nov 26, 2021
openssl-machine pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 26, 2021
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <[email protected]>
(Merged from #17084)
@t8m t8m added the branch: 3.0 Applies to openssl-3.0 branch label May 3, 2022
@t8m
Copy link
Member

t8m commented May 3, 2022

This needs to be cherry-picked to 3.0 when merging #17085 to avoid regression.
@paulidale do you agree?

@t8m t8m reopened this May 3, 2022
@openssl-machine
Copy link
Collaborator

24 hours has passed since 'approval: done' was set, but as this PR has been updated in that time the label 'approval: ready to merge' is not being automatically set. Please review the updates and set the label manually.

@paulidale
Copy link
Contributor

Agreed.

@t8m
Copy link
Member

t8m commented May 5, 2022

Cherry picked to 3.0 branch.

@t8m t8m closed this May 5, 2022
openssl-machine pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 5, 2022
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <[email protected]>
(Merged from #17084)

(cherry picked from commit 8e22f9d)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approval: done This pull request has the required number of approvals branch: master Applies to master branch branch: 3.0 Applies to openssl-3.0 branch triaged: feature The issue/pr requests/adds a feature

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants