Skip to content

README.md: fix two leftovers from pull request #10545#12361

Closed
mspncp wants to merge 2 commits intoopenssl:masterfrom
mspncp:pr-fix-some-10545-todos
Closed

README.md: fix two leftovers from pull request #10545#12361
mspncp wants to merge 2 commits intoopenssl:masterfrom
mspncp:pr-fix-some-10545-todos

Conversation

@mspncp
Copy link
Contributor

@mspncp mspncp commented Jul 2, 2020

commit 02054d791a52f02de66844ef6f9384378fb2877d (master)
Author: Dr. Matthias St. Pierre [email protected]
Date: Thu Jul 2 20:00:03 2020 +0200

README.md: replace incorrect access token for the AppVeyor badge

The AppVeyor badge was still showing the build state for
the mspncp/openssl fork.

This commit fixes a forgotten todo from #10545.

Author: Dr. Matthias St. Pierre [email protected]
Date: Thu Jul 2 20:04:44 2020 +0200

README.md: remove incorrect link to openssl.github.io

The link to the OpenSSL Project Pages <openssl.github.io>
actually points to an unfinished draft <mspncp.github.io>.

The original intention of this pet project of mine was to
have a website dedicated to describing the OpenSSL workflow
on GitHub and to answer frequently asked questions related
to pull requests and the review process.

The progress on that project has stalled and I'm not so sure
anymore whether it is good idea to have yet another project
website. In particular since the OpenSSL Wiki has seen some
revival and increased activity caused by the upcoming
OpenSSL 3.0 release.

@mspncp mspncp added the branch: master Applies to master branch label Jul 2, 2020
@mspncp mspncp changed the title README.md: replace incorrect access token for the AppVeyor badge README.md: fix two leftovers from pull request #10545 Jul 2, 2020
README.md Outdated
Comment on lines -210 to -216
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mspncp mspncp Jul 2, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@openssl/omc can somebody of you please do me a favour and send me the correct access token for the appveyor badge? It can be obtained only by a GitHub project owner of the openssl/openssl project.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How does one get the access token?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would expect that you just have to follow the link mentioned in the comment and login with your GitHub account if you are not logged in already. If you have the correct permissions, you should see something like the following:

image

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I just tried it: If the login screen reappears, you don't have the necessary permissions.

README.md Outdated
Comment on lines 231 to 224
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just post the link here, I will insert it.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All I need is the random part of the URL, which in my case is ikn2l4u1xsume63u.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you. Added in commit 4d75b684092527d50d2a82e40e2c0bf4f34ae0be.

@mspncp mspncp added the triaged: documentation The issue/pr deals with documentation (errors) label Jul 2, 2020
@mspncp
Copy link
Contributor Author

mspncp commented Jul 14, 2020

ping

@mspncp mspncp marked this pull request as ready for review July 14, 2020 05:31
mspncp added 2 commits August 9, 2020 23:19
The AppVeyor badge was still showing the build state for
the mspncp/openssl fork.

This commit fixes a forgotten todo from openssl#10545.
The link to the OpenSSL Project Pages <openssl.github.io>
actually points to an unfinished draft <mspncp.github.io>.

The original intention of this pet project of mine was to
have a website dedicated to describing the OpenSSL workflow
on GitHub and to answer frequently asked questions related
to pull requests and the review process.

The progress on that project has stalled and I'm not so sure
anymore whether it is good idea to have yet another project
website. In particular since the OpenSSL Wiki has seen some
revival and increased activity caused by the upcoming
OpenSSL 3.0 release.
@mspncp mspncp force-pushed the pr-fix-some-10545-todos branch from 4d75b68 to 68da307 Compare August 9, 2020 21:20
@mspncp
Copy link
Contributor Author

mspncp commented Aug 9, 2020

Rebased and autosquashed without further changes. Ping for second review.

@mattcaswell mattcaswell added the approval: done This pull request has the required number of approvals label Aug 10, 2020
@openssl-machine openssl-machine added approval: ready to merge The 24 hour grace period has passed, ready to merge and removed approval: done This pull request has the required number of approvals labels Aug 11, 2020
@openssl-machine
Copy link
Collaborator

This pull request is ready to merge

openssl-machine pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2020
The AppVeyor badge was still showing the build state for
the mspncp/openssl fork.

This commit fixes a forgotten todo from #10545.

Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <[email protected]>
(Merged from #12361)
openssl-machine pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2020
The link to the OpenSSL Project Pages <openssl.github.io>
actually points to an unfinished draft <mspncp.github.io>.

The original intention of this pet project of mine was to
have a website dedicated to describing the OpenSSL workflow
on GitHub and to answer frequently asked questions related
to pull requests and the review process.

The progress on that project has stalled and I'm not so sure
anymore whether it is good idea to have yet another project
website. In particular since the OpenSSL Wiki has seen some
revival and increased activity caused by the upcoming
OpenSSL 3.0 release.

Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <[email protected]>
(Merged from #12361)
@mspncp
Copy link
Contributor Author

mspncp commented Aug 11, 2020

Merged to master, thanks!

36b778f README.md: remove incorrect link to openssl.github.io
0799b79 README.md: replace incorrect access token for the AppVeyor badge

@mspncp mspncp closed this Aug 11, 2020
swenkeratmicrosoft pushed a commit to swenkeratmicrosoft/openssl that referenced this pull request Sep 1, 2020
The AppVeyor badge was still showing the build state for
the mspncp/openssl fork.

This commit fixes a forgotten todo from openssl#10545.

Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <[email protected]>
(Merged from openssl#12361)
swenkeratmicrosoft pushed a commit to swenkeratmicrosoft/openssl that referenced this pull request Sep 1, 2020
The link to the OpenSSL Project Pages <openssl.github.io>
actually points to an unfinished draft <mspncp.github.io>.

The original intention of this pet project of mine was to
have a website dedicated to describing the OpenSSL workflow
on GitHub and to answer frequently asked questions related
to pull requests and the review process.

The progress on that project has stalled and I'm not so sure
anymore whether it is good idea to have yet another project
website. In particular since the OpenSSL Wiki has seen some
revival and increased activity caused by the upcoming
OpenSSL 3.0 release.

Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <[email protected]>
(Merged from openssl#12361)
@mspncp mspncp deleted the pr-fix-some-10545-todos branch October 20, 2023 10:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approval: ready to merge The 24 hour grace period has passed, ready to merge branch: master Applies to master branch triaged: documentation The issue/pr deals with documentation (errors)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants