Skip to content

Conversation

@priyabrata-stack
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 4, 2025

Failed to generate code suggestions for PR

@greptile-apps
Copy link
Contributor

greptile-apps bot commented Dec 4, 2025

Greptile Overview

Greptile Summary

Adds comprehensive test case for pipeline condition nodes handling event_name=null values. The test validates complete lifecycle: pipeline creation with null condition, data ingestion with null values, condition evaluation, data flow verification, and proper cleanup.

Key changes:

  • New parameterized test test_pipeline_with_null_event_in_condition covering null value handling in condition nodes
  • Tests condition node with event_name = null operator and value
  • Validates data correctly flows through pipeline when event_name field is None
  • Includes detailed logging for debugging pipeline behavior
  • Follows existing test patterns with proper setup, validation, and teardown

Observations:

  • Test properly uses existing helper functions (validate_data_flow, safe_sql_identifier, get_time_window)
  • Follows established patterns from other tests in the file
  • Includes comprehensive assertions and error messages
  • Proper cleanup with pipeline deletion verification

Confidence Score: 5/5

  • This PR is safe to merge - it adds a focused test case with no production code changes
  • The PR only adds a new test case following established patterns in the codebase. It uses existing helper functions, includes proper assertions and cleanup, and employs the logging framework consistently with other tests. No production code is modified.
  • No files require special attention

Important Files Changed

File Analysis

Filename Score Overview
tests/api-testing/tests/test_pipeline_dynamic.py 5/5 Added comprehensive test for pipeline condition node handling event_name=null, including proper validation and cleanup

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant Test as Test Function
    participant API as Pipeline API
    participant Pipeline as Pipeline Engine
    participant Source as Source Stream
    participant Dest as Destination Stream
    
    Test->>API: POST /pipelines (create with event_name=null condition)
    API-->>Test: 200 OK (pipeline created)
    
    Test->>API: GET /pipelines (verify creation)
    API-->>Test: Return pipeline_id
    
    Test->>API: PUT /pipelines/{id}/enable
    API-->>Test: 200 OK (pipeline enabled)
    
    Test->>Source: POST /_json (ingest data with event_name=None)
    Source-->>Test: 200 OK (data ingested)
    
    Test->>API: POST /_search (verify source stream data)
    API-->>Test: Return source records
    
    Note over Pipeline: Pipeline processes data<br/>Evaluates event_name=null condition
    
    Pipeline->>Dest: Route data to destination stream
    
    Test->>API: POST /_search (validate destination stream)
    API-->>Test: Return destination records
    
    Test->>API: DELETE /pipelines/{id}
    API-->>Test: 200 OK (cleanup complete)
    
    Test->>API: GET /pipelines (verify deletion)
    API-->>Test: Pipeline no longer exists
Loading

Copy link
Contributor

@greptile-apps greptile-apps bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

1 file reviewed, no comments

Edit Code Review Agent Settings | Greptile

@priyabrata-stack priyabrata-stack force-pushed the test/add-null-condition-pipeline-test branch 4 times, most recently from 1ac00ed to be59654 Compare December 4, 2025 10:54
@priyabrata-stack priyabrata-stack force-pushed the test/add-null-condition-pipeline-test branch from be59654 to 8f7cf5d Compare December 4, 2025 12:33
@priyabrata-stack priyabrata-stack merged commit 2a03b2a into main Dec 4, 2025
51 of 70 checks passed
@priyabrata-stack priyabrata-stack deleted the test/add-null-condition-pipeline-test branch December 4, 2025 13:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants