Skip to content

Conversation

@hengfeiyang
Copy link
Contributor

@hengfeiyang hengfeiyang commented Sep 10, 2025

PR Type

Earlier it increased by update cargo.lock, but the update got performance problem we already rollbacked cargo.lock so, we also need to reduce the coverage ratio.


Description

  • Adjust default coverage thresholds downward

  • Update functions, lines, regions minimums

  • Maintain script usage and behavior


Diagram Walkthrough

flowchart LR
  coverage["coverage.sh defaults"] -- "functions 64 -> 63" --> functions["COVERAGE_FUNCTIONS"]
  coverage -- "lines 64 -> 60" --> lines["COVERAGE_LINES"]
  coverage -- "regions 63 -> 58" --> regions["COVERAGE_REGIONS"]
Loading

File Walkthrough

Relevant files
Configuration changes
coverage.sh
Lower coverage thresholds for CI defaults                               

coverage.sh

  • Decrease COVERAGE_FUNCTIONS default: 64 -> 63
  • Decrease COVERAGE_LINES default: 64 -> 60
  • Decrease COVERAGE_REGIONS default: 63 -> 58
+3/-3     

Copy link
Contributor

@greptile-apps greptile-apps bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Greptile Summary

This PR rolls back code coverage thresholds in the CI system by reducing three coverage requirements in the coverage.sh script. The changes lower COVERAGE_FUNCTIONS from 64% to 63%, COVERAGE_LINES from 64% to 60%, and COVERAGE_REGIONS from 63% to 58%.

The coverage.sh script is part of the CI/CD pipeline that validates code coverage using cargo llvm-cov for the Rust codebase. These environment variables define minimum coverage thresholds that must be met for the coverage checks to pass. When the cmd_check function runs, it compares actual coverage statistics from report.json against these thresholds and fails the build if coverage falls below the required levels.

Based on the PR title "ci: rollback coverage by mistake", this appears to be reverting an accidental increase in coverage requirements that was likely causing CI failures. The original higher thresholds (64%, 64%, 63%) were probably too strict for the current state of the codebase, preventing successful builds and merges. By rolling back to the previous values (63%, 60%, 58%), the CI system can function properly while still maintaining reasonable coverage standards.

Confidence score: 5/5

  • This PR is safe to merge with minimal risk as it only adjusts CI configuration values
  • Score reflects the straightforward nature of reverting configuration changes that were causing CI issues
  • No files require special attention as this is a simple rollback of coverage thresholds

1 file reviewed, no comments

Edit Code Review Bot Settings | Greptile

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 1 🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪
🧪 No relevant tests
🔒 No security concerns identified
⚡ Recommended focus areas for review

Documentation Drift

Ensure README/CI docs and any workflows referencing previous coverage thresholds are updated to reflect the new defaults to avoid confusion in pipelines or dashboards.

export COVERAGE_FUNCTIONS=${COVERAGE_FUNCTIONS:-63}
export COVERAGE_LINES=${COVERAGE_LINES:-60}
export COVERAGE_REGIONS=${COVERAGE_REGIONS:-58}
UX Messaging

Verify the script's help/usage output and any failure messages clearly state the new default thresholds so users understand why a job fails or passes.

usage() {
    cat <<EOF
Usage: $0 [-h | --help] [<command>]

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Explore these optional code suggestions:

CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Impact
Possible issue
Reinstate stricter coverage thresholds

Lowering these default thresholds can silently mask coverage regressions. Restore
the previous stricter defaults to prevent accidental drops in code quality while
still allowing overrides via environment variables.

coverage.sh [6-8]

-export COVERAGE_FUNCTIONS=${COVERAGE_FUNCTIONS:-63}
-export COVERAGE_LINES=${COVERAGE_LINES:-60}
-export COVERAGE_REGIONS=${COVERAGE_REGIONS:-58}
+export COVERAGE_FUNCTIONS=${COVERAGE_FUNCTIONS:-64}
+export COVERAGE_LINES=${COVERAGE_LINES:-64}
+export COVERAGE_REGIONS=${COVERAGE_REGIONS:-63}
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

__

Why: The suggestion correctly identifies that the PR lowers default coverage thresholds and proposes restoring the previous stricter values, which helps prevent silent regressions. It is accurate to the diff and improves quality, though it’s a policy choice rather than a functional bug fix.

Medium

@hengfeiyang hengfeiyang merged commit 7559780 into main Sep 10, 2025
11 of 13 checks passed
@hengfeiyang hengfeiyang deleted the ci/unittest branch September 10, 2025 02:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants