Skip to content

Conversation

@haohuaijin
Copy link
Collaborator

@haohuaijin haohuaijin commented Nov 4, 2024

fixed #4980

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced handling of SQL stream names to prevent syntax errors with special characters.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling for scenarios with no available querier nodes and empty search conditions.
  • Refactor

    • Refined logic for constructing SQL queries and clarified conditions for using inverted indexes.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 4, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to the src/service/search/cluster/flight.rs file, focusing on the register_table function and SQL stream name handling. Key changes include formatting the stream_name variable with double quotes to prevent SQL syntax errors, refining SQL query construction in the get_inverted_index_file_lists and get_inverted_index_file_list functions, and enhancing error handling for various conditions. The overall control flow remains unchanged, but the logic within existing functions is improved for clarity and robustness.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/service/search/cluster/flight.rs - Modified register_table to format stream_name with double quotes.
- Refined logic in get_inverted_index_file_lists and get_inverted_index_file_list for SQL query construction.
- Enhanced error handling and logging for various conditions.

Possibly related PRs

  • feat: new search engine #4182: The changes in src/service/search/cluster/mod.rs regarding the handling of the schema_latest variable may relate to the modifications in SQL handling and error management in src/service/search/cluster/flight.rs, as both involve SQL context and schema management.

Suggested labels

🧹 Updates


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4603b26 and 408354b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/service/search/cluster/flight.rs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
src/service/search/cluster/flight.rs (1)

Pattern **/*.rs: You are a smart rustlang pull request reviewer.
You are going to review all the rustlang files.
Be concise, and add a brief explanation to your suggestions

Make sure the responses are not too verbose and keep the suggestions to the point i.e. actionable.

🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/service/search/cluster/flight.rs (1)

736-736: LGTM! Quoting stream names fixes the capital letter issue.

The change correctly wraps stream names in double quotes, which fixes SQL syntax issues with capital letters and will also handle special characters in stream names.

Let's verify there are no other unquoted stream names in SQL queries:

✅ Verification successful

The search results show that the unquoted identifiers found are all related to INFORMATION_SCHEMA queries, which is a standard SQL catalog that doesn't require quoting as these are fixed system table names. These findings don't represent any issues with stream name handling.

Let's verify if there are any other potential cases specifically in the search/cluster code where stream names might be used unquoted:


Stream name quoting is consistently implemented

The verification confirms that stream names are properly quoted in SQL queries throughout the codebase. The only instance found in the search/cluster code already uses proper quoting with "\"{}\"" format. The other unquoted identifiers found were standard INFORMATION_SCHEMA queries which are system tables and don't require quoting.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for SQL queries that might contain unquoted stream names
rg -U 'SELECT .+ FROM ["]*[A-Z][a-zA-Z0-9_]*[^"]'

Length of output: 1112


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search specifically in search/cluster directory for potential SQL queries with FROM clauses
rg -U 'FROM\s+([^"\s]+)' src/service/search/cluster/

Length of output: 153


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the ☢️ Bug Something isn't working label Nov 4, 2024
@haohuaijin haohuaijin changed the title fix: capital stream name can't search fix: capital stream can't search Nov 4, 2024
@hengfeiyang hengfeiyang merged commit 773dcea into main Nov 4, 2024
26 checks passed
@hengfeiyang hengfeiyang deleted the hj/fix-search-for-capital-name branch November 4, 2024 09:39
@hengfeiyang
Copy link
Contributor

ralted to #4979

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

☢️ Bug Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Upper stream naming issue from v0.13.0 onwards

3 participants