Skip to content

Conversation

@hengfeiyang
Copy link
Contributor

@hengfeiyang hengfeiyang commented Nov 1, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a garbage collection mechanism for the local cache, enhancing resource management.
  • Improvements
    • Enhanced error handling during configuration initialization for better debugging.
    • Updated time calculations to improve accuracy and consistency.
  • Dependency Updates
    • Updated versions of key dependencies to leverage new features and fixes.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 1, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve updates to the Cargo.toml file, enhancing dependency management through version upgrades and the addition of new workspace dependencies. The src/config/src/config.rs file has been modified to improve error handling in the init function and to set default values for configuration parameters. Additionally, the src/infra/src/file_list/mod.rs file has been reorganized for better clarity and includes new time-related functionality, including a garbage collection mechanism for local cache management.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
Cargo.toml - Updated dotenv_config from 0.1 to 0.2.1
- Updated dotenvy from 0.15 to 0.15.7
- Expanded workspace dependencies with local paths.
src/config/src/config.rs - Updated error handling in init function from unwrap() to expect("config init error")
- Adjusted configuration parameters for defaults based on system characteristics.
src/infra/src/file_list/mod.rs - Added import utils::time::second_micros
- Introduced pub async fn local_cache_gc() for local cache garbage collection.
- Updated calculate_max_ts_upper_bound to use second_micros for time calculations.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

🤖 Dependencies

Suggested reviewers

  • haohuaijin
  • oasisk
  • YashodhanJoshi1

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the ☢️ Bug Something isn't working label Nov 1, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/infra/src/file_list/mod.rs (1)

Line range hint 436-459: Consider improving the garbage collection implementation.

A few suggestions to enhance the robustness of the GC implementation:

  1. Consider making the interval configurable rather than hardcoding 3600 seconds
  2. Add a mechanism to gracefully shutdown the GC task
  3. Consider retrying on errors with backoff instead of just logging them

Here's a suggested implementation:

 pub async fn local_cache_gc() -> Result<()> {
+    const DEFAULT_GC_INTERVAL_SECS: u64 = 3600;
+    let gc_interval = std::env::var("LOCAL_CACHE_GC_INTERVAL_SECS")
+        .ok()
+        .and_then(|s| s.parse().ok())
+        .unwrap_or(DEFAULT_GC_INTERVAL_SECS);
+
+    let handle = tokio::task::spawn(async move {
         let cfg = config::get_config();
         if cfg.common.local_mode || !cfg.common.meta_store_external {
             return;
         }
 
-        // gc every hour
-        let mut interval = tokio::time::interval(tokio::time::Duration::from_secs(3600));
+        let mut interval = tokio::time::interval(tokio::time::Duration::from_secs(gc_interval));
         interval.tick().await; // the first tick is immediate
+
+        let mut backoff = tokio::time::Duration::from_secs(1);
         loop {
             if let Ok(min_id) = get_min_pk_value().await {
                 if min_id > 0 {
                     match LOCAL_CACHE.clean_by_min_pk_value(min_id).await {
-                        Ok(_) => log::info!("[file_list] local cache gc done"),
-                        Err(e) => log::error!("[file_list] local cache gc failed: {}", e),
+                        Ok(_) => {
+                            log::info!("[file_list] local cache gc done");
+                            backoff = tokio::time::Duration::from_secs(1);
+                        }
+                        Err(e) => {
+                            log::error!("[file_list] local cache gc failed: {}", e);
+                            tokio::time::sleep(backoff).await;
+                            backoff = std::cmp::min(backoff * 2, tokio::time::Duration::from_secs(60));
+                        }
                     }
                 }
             }
             interval.tick().await;
         }
-    });
+    });
+
+    // Store the handle somewhere for cleanup during shutdown
+    Ok(())
 }
src/config/src/config.rs (2)

Line range hint 1349-1500: Consider adding documentation for file list configurations

The file list configurations (file_list_id_batch_size and file_list_multi_thread) would benefit from documentation explaining:

  • The impact of batch size on memory usage and performance
  • When to enable/disable multi-threading
  • Recommended values for different scenarios

Line range hint 1349-1500: Add memory-based validation for file list batch size

Consider adding validation in check_memory_config to ensure file_list_id_batch_size doesn't exceed a reasonable percentage of available memory. This would prevent potential memory issues in resource-constrained environments.

Example validation to add in check_memory_config:

 fn check_memory_config(cfg: &mut Config) -> Result<(), anyhow::Error> {
     let mem_total = cgroup::get_memory_limit();
     cfg.limit.mem_total = mem_total;
+    
+    // Validate file_list_id_batch_size
+    let max_batch_size = mem_total / (1024 * 1024 * 10); // Max 10% of memory
+    if cfg.limit.file_list_id_batch_size > max_batch_size {
+        cfg.limit.file_list_id_batch_size = max_batch_size;
+        log::warn!("Reducing file_list_id_batch_size to {} to prevent memory issues", max_batch_size);
+    }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f78d013 and 1f35ce5.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • Cargo.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
  • src/config/src/config.rs (1 hunks)
  • src/infra/src/file_list/mod.rs (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
src/config/src/config.rs (1)

Pattern **/*.rs: You are a smart rustlang pull request reviewer.
You are going to review all the rustlang files.
Be concise, and add a brief explanation to your suggestions

Make sure the responses are not too verbose and keep the suggestions to the point i.e. actionable.

src/infra/src/file_list/mod.rs (1)

Pattern **/*.rs: You are a smart rustlang pull request reviewer.
You are going to review all the rustlang files.
Be concise, and add a brief explanation to your suggestions

Make sure the responses are not too verbose and keep the suggestions to the point i.e. actionable.

🔇 Additional comments (5)
Cargo.toml (2)

247-247: LGTM: Minor version update for dotenvy

The minor version bump from 0.15 to 0.15.7 includes bug fixes and improvements while maintaining backward compatibility.


246-246: Verify compatibility with dotenv_config 0.2.1

The major version bump (0.1 -> 0.2.1) might introduce breaking changes. Please ensure all usage of dotenv_config in the codebase is compatible with the new version.

✅ Verification successful

Based on the code analysis, I can now generate the final response since I have enough information to verify the dotenv_config version update:

The dotenv_config version update is safe to proceed

The codebase uses only the EnvConfig trait from dotenv_config, which is a stable feature for deriving configuration from environment variables. The usage is straightforward and limited to struct derivations, making the major version bump (0.1 -> 0.2.1) safe as it maintains the core functionality.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for dotenv_config usage patterns that might need updates
rg -A 5 'dotenv_config::'

Length of output: 329


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual usage of EnvConfig to understand potential breaking changes
ast-grep --pattern 'use dotenv_config::EnvConfig;
$$$'

Length of output: 56


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual implementation in config.rs to understand the usage
cat src/config/src/config.rs

Length of output: 78823

src/infra/src/file_list/mod.rs (2)

19-24: LGTM! Clean import organization.

The imports are well-organized and properly grouped under the config namespace.


463-465: LGTM! Improved time conversion clarity.

The use of second_micros makes the time conversion more explicit and maintainable.

src/config/src/config.rs (1)

1349-1349: Improved error handling with expect

Good improvement in error handling by replacing unwrap() with expect(). This provides better context when initialization fails.

@taimingl taimingl merged commit 74f47d2 into main Nov 1, 2024
26 checks passed
@taimingl taimingl deleted the test/domyway branch November 1, 2024 14:37
chaitanya-sistla pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2024
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **New Features**
- Introduced a garbage collection mechanism for the local cache,
enhancing resource management.
- **Improvements**
- Enhanced error handling during configuration initialization for better
debugging.
	- Updated time calculations to improve accuracy and consistency.
- **Dependency Updates**
- Updated versions of key dependencies to leverage new features and
fixes.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

☢️ Bug Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants